dw_sheffwed Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Lucky or ment to do it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAWAWUTO17 Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Ment to do it. Was more surprised my Laverys control Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigger Guns Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Definitely meant it. Could see him look over the far side before pinging it. Slightly over hit but lavery did superb to bring it under control and get a shot away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 McGugan freekick, did he mean to do it? For me, tells you all you need to know, quality player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Baggins Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Which brings me on to. Why the hell did Maguire take that free kick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Why the hell did Maguire take that free kick? good question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl In Black Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Which brings me on to. Why the hell did Maguire take that free kick? i dont know the answer to your question. However im not sure mcgugan should have been on the pitch did he receive treatment. Law says he has to leave pitch... its a daft rule that one, you were injured by your opponent so you have to go off the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Which brings me on to. Why the hell did Maguire take that free kick? Thinks he's better than what he is - best free kick taker should always be on them, no arguments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigger Guns Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 i dont know the answer to your question. However im not sure mcgugan should have been on the pitch did he receive treatment. Law says he has to leave pitch... its a daft rule that one, you were injured by your opponent so you have to go off the pitch. That's correct. Both McGugan and vermijl had physio treatment so by the letter of the law should have left the pitch until after play was restarted. However, if you get away with it you let McGugan take the bleedin thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOwl Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I'll defend Maguire (He doesn't deserve it): Lewis had already had one or two chances from free kicks and not hit the target, so Maguire probably thought he had the right to have a go. However lets be honest here, the second his boot made contact with the ball, I knew there'd be no chance of it being a goal. Quality backpass though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldishowl Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I don't understand why the manager does not make sure that the player with the best chance of scoring ie mcgugan always takes them. It is pretty basic , and maguire should be told to leave them alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl In Black Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 However, if you get away with it you let McGugan take the bleedin thing that was never in dispute my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dc88 Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 i dont know the answer to your question. However im not sure mcgugan should have been on the pitch did he receive treatment. Law says he has to leave pitch... its a daft rule that one, you were injured by your opponent so you have to go off the pitch. i am sure the rule relates to whether or not the player receives treatment, not whether they are 'injured' or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest totemowl Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I don't understand why the manager does not make sure that the player with the best chance of scoring ie mcgugan always takes them. It is pretty basic , and maguire should be told to leave them alone If McGugan was still winded / lame but Maguire was fresh then that's a good reason for Maguire to give it a go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingOwl Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 The control by Lavery was absolutely beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl In Black Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 i am sure the rule relates to whether or not the player receives treatment, not whether they are 'injured' or not. yeh i know that but u would have to be injured to require treatment. As you'll see i asked if he received treatment :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Iron Hunter Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 The control by Lavery was absolutely beautiful. Best bit of skill all season though disappointed that he didnt try the Van Basten! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thetruthisoutthere Posted April 5, 2015 Share Posted April 5, 2015 Actually I think the rule regarding leaving the field of play where it is injury related refers to a head injury not a basic tackle (leg injury) happy to be corrected if wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmb Posted April 5, 2015 Share Posted April 5, 2015 It's not...the rule is physio comes on player goes off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOwl Posted April 5, 2015 Share Posted April 5, 2015 Actually I think the rule regarding leaving the field of play where it is injury related refers to a head injury not a basic tackle (leg injury) happy to be corrected if wrong You're wrong ... Oh alright, I suppose I should actually give evidence... One of the subsections yadda yadda yadda of Rule 5: "An injured player may only return to the field of play after the match has restarted" Once they get any sort of treatment, they've got to leave the pitch until the match has restarted. No way he should have been on the pitch (although it's completely inconsequential in the end). Also, I think Isgrove went down injured too... we should have been down to 9! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now