geriatricowl Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 I suspect most of us would love to see Antonio, Batth, Ranger and Treacy all return to the fold, but I reckon we would be fortunate to resign 2 of them either permanently or on loan . So the question is :- If we could only get two of them back which two would you choose and why ? I reckon most would go for Antonio and Batth, but with Ranger offering much potential and Treacy having looked very good when he played is it that simple . What do you think ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furious George Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio and Batth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sami Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio and Batth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio & Treacy; Batth was excellent for us, but i'd have no concerns pairing Gardner & Llera together - messers Jones and Beevers back-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddyowl Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Batth. and Antonio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malek Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Batth & Antonio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lamort Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Batthtonio and Rangeacy :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest intercity0wl Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio & Ranger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo_ Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 McGoldrick & Bostock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest foreverSWFC Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio and Treacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2Owl Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio + Ranger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sniper1 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 1. Antonio - his direct running and strength is something we would miss, match winner. 2. Treacy - Set pieces and quality from wide areas is something we have missed, consistent quality delivery, nothing better. Sorry Danny Batth but we have good options at the back where we have very little in the way of creativity in the final third (at the moment). Ranger offers what Gary Madine offers, would still like him to sign but not a priority for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innes Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 antonio and batth then ranger, then treacy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjani Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio and Batth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fedor Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio, Treacy, Batth, Ranger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hudders Owl87 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 McGoldrick & Bostock :giddings: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wadsgod Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio Ranger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamb1253 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Antonio and Treacy. Whilst I am grateful for all Danny Batth did, and I'd take him back at the drop of a hat, we have now covered the CB position. However, we are in dire need of strikers. If the season was to start now, it'd be JJ and M Jones on the flanks, and that just isn't good enough to compete in the Championship. As for Ranger, I would take a gamble on him, provided he was willing to take a wage cut. He showed glimpses of promise, and for me, was let down only by his fitness. He seemed to have the right attitude, but his frustration spawned from himself not being able to convert what he was presented with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parkfieldowl14 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 McGoldrick & Bostock :wacko: :st2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now