Jump to content

SWFC end of year accounts


Recommended Posts

And if the £5.1m relates to the three charges that have been satisfied as of beginning of Feb, and the £11m due to UKFI has all been converted to shares, then our debt is our £1.6m overdraft?

Or have a read that wrong?

It is impossible to say as there is no reference to what has happened with the takeover. The accounts were signed and approved by MM on 29th November 2014 so reflect the world as on that date

We do know the following

a) The amount owed to UKFI was just over £11m. Of this £822k has been converted to shares. So not all the debt just £822k. It is presumed this was done to ensure compliance with FFP rules

b) The total of the 3rd party loans was £5.1m. This is the ones we knew about from the charges registered at Companies House plus a further £1.6m that was obtained in April 14. The accounts refer to the fact that at end of November the repayment date had been re- scheduled to October 15 on the older loans. The newer loan was due to be paid at end of Jan 15 and a balance end of March. We do know the charges have now been cleared thus the 99% presumption is that those have been repaid or otherwise cleared

c) There was a separate overdraft of £1.4m. The presumption is that Chansari will put their own facilities in place

d) Don't be confused between creditors and debt. In a football club accounts this will include deferred income ie season ticket monies received for the 14/15 season banked before 31st May 14. There is also a technical amount in long term creditors in relation to a grant received years ago for the development of the stadiun

So there are no clues as to the Chansari deal. This is mooted at 30m but how that is structured who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't careless.

But don't ever go into advocacy or journalism.

Now, is there a point to this?

What is it.

 

If you don't like what you see move on and ignore instead of pathetically calling people pigs because you don't like what they post.  The accounts are like the team under Gray, you may accept utter sh!te year after year but it doesn't mean eveyone should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Page 20.

11 + 12 shows 27 million owed, so what's the debt, 17, 25 or 27 million?

No that is the figure for the total of creditors due less than one year and more than one year.

The debt element is

11m due to Ukfi

5.1m due on other loans

1.4m due on bank overdraft

Total debt = 17.5m

We have no idea whether all this has repaid or not.

Chansari could have bought UKFI for all we know and thus acquired the loan balance of 11m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't like what you see move on and ignore instead of pathetically calling people pigs because you don't like what they post.  The accounts are like the team under Gray, you may accept utter sh!te year after year but it doesn't mean eveyone should.

 

You missed the R out.  lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No that is the figure for the total of creditors due less than one year and more than one year.

The debt element is

11m due to Ukfi

5.1m due on other loans

1.4m due on bank overdraft

Total debt = 17.5m

We have no idea whether all this has repaid or not.

Chansari could have bought UKFI for all we know and thus acquired the loan balance of 11m.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't like what you see move on and ignore instead of pathetically calling people pigs because you don't like what they post.  The accounts are like the team under Gray, you may accept utter sh!te year after year but it doesn't mean eveyone should.

 

So you are a season ticket holder but you state you will not now accept 'utter poo ' in terms of the team under Gray and the accounts.

 

 4 seasons ago we were in the bottom half of division 3 and had just been saved from the brink of administration after years of financial mis-mananagement but you think what we have now is totally unacceptable?

 

Rather than continuing to post drivel and constant negatives why not read what the Wednesday fans who are accountants have stated in this thread.

 

You point to our apparent lack of fans as an issue moving forward financially.

 

It is not surprising that our support has dipped due to our home form this season but we still compare favourably against most teams in the Championship and we run on a smaller wage bill than most.

Losses in any business are not good but in comparison with our division and football in general our losses are small and our fan base and potential is what has made us worth buying into.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are a season ticket holder but you state you will not now accept 'utter poo ' in terms of the team under Gray and the accounts.

4 seasons ago we were in the bottom half of division 3 and had just been saved from the brink of administration after years of financial mis-mananagement but you think what we have now is totally unacceptable?

Rather than continuing to post drivel and constant negatives why not read what the Wednesday fans who are accountants have stated in this thread.

You point to our apparent lack of fans as an issue moving forward financially.

It is not surprising that our support has dipped due to our home form this season but we still compare favourably against most teams in the Championship and we run on a smaller wage bill than most.

Losses in any business are not good but in comparison with our division and football in general our losses are small and our fan base and potential is what has made us worth buying into.

Let's hope we don't end up like Portsmouth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm another accountant and agree with this, although the stadium revaluation doesn't impact the debt. Debt is around £17m. (overdraft + other loans+ due to UKFI).

Please can everyone ignore Hamy. He's just on the wind up. Mind the gap Hamy!

Nothing wrong with the stadium revaluation of course, should be done on a regularish basis.

Uplifted the value by 3m or so but quite scary that the balance sheet is still technically insolvent at 31 May 14

Not quite smoke and mirrors but the fact the accounts showed net assets of 18m at May 11 and now that is all gone with debts incurred to cover the losses just shows what an awful business football is. If this was anything other than a football club you would be dismayed

I suspect MM has just about broken even on the deal cash wise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be so much easier if the club made a statement saying we have made x- profit or x- Debt instead of a load of numbers not one fan on this thread understands.

I understand them !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah must be ace being bottom of the table getting dicked every week

 

In which division, with how much extra income as a result of winning the Championship last season?

 

You must be one of those blunts excited about being 'competitive' in division 3 every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...