Owls_fan_since_1983 Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 Did the referee had a West Brom shirt underneath his top. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bolsterstone B Army Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 Proposed new rule change announced a long while ago for next season. ie substituted players leave the pitch at the nearest line and point of exit . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleblue Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 (edited) Said this before, but it should be done in a similar way to rugby, ref does not control the time it is done independently, the ref could always signal to the time keeper that he wants time added on for time wasting etc, should be set limits on time added on for say subs and player injuries, another way is to add time on when the ball is dead, and the clock starts again as soon as ball in play. Edited December 30, 2018 by daleblue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRightSide Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 Complaining about the 9 mins of injury time is so tinpot. The goal was scored in the 5th minute of 6 and we’d been time wasting for the previous 5 Add those together and its no real surprise that we managed to get 2mins 20secs extra (in which nothing of note happened) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Von shabba Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 3 hours ago, Beholder said: I'm by no means condoning the ref ading 9 minutes yesterday. But I think walking off extra slow when you are trying to time waste only makes the refs add it on at the end with interest. It's all about their perception. And a slow paced walk compared to a medium /slow paced jog doesn't actually waste that much time compared to the time refs penalise for it if they perceive time wasting. There clearly weren't 9 minutes of stoppages in that half, West Brom subs all came in one and there were no goals. So the ref has added massive time because he perceived we time wasted. So to conclude that overlong post, I think we should limit time wasting as it only annoys refs and makes them add 9 minutes from nowhere. Or maybe because we had an extra man, keep the ball and not invite them to forward for the last 10 minutes and suffer the inevitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owlsend Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 A tactic which has been used for years and years and years walking off very slowly wee wees me off even with my own team Does it Super winds up the ref 7 times out of 10 you end up conceding And geting you’re just Deserves-for time Wasting. Just gets me mad that’s all it’s time for the angry face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sova Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 It's all very well talking about keeping the ball (even with an extra man), but we can barely manage to keep it for 30 seconds anyway, let alone keep it for 6 minutes of added time! Incidentally, according to here: https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/championship/gegentorverteilung/wettbewerb/GB2/plus/1 that was the first injury time goal we've conceded this season. So maybe we're so bad in that area after all. Of course, this might have a lot to do with the fact that our goals against record for the previous 45 minutes is appalling, so the opposition don't need to bother attacking in added time (Ipswich haven't conceded any goals in injury time). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now