Jump to content

If you HAD to choose...


Recommended Posts

Waddle. 

 

Chris Waddle 5 West Ham 0 

 

For that game alone it's Waddle for me. Hirst was brilliant, but Waddle was world class and unplayable at times.

 

PS. I do know Waddle only scored the once in that game. But it is testimony to his ability that it is such named.

Edited by Anthndav
Mehh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, MaliceInBlunderland said:

After many seconds of painstaking research...

IMG_20180606_193752031.thumb.jpg.f4f614e6347223dec84e9735fc777d55.jpg

 

... I have come to the inevitable conclusion that I don't really know.

 

All I can say is that whoever rated Waddle at a mere 66!!! wants their head checking.

 

ps top trumps belong to my daughter (no, really, they do).:biggrin:

 

 

 

66?! Surely they printed his score upside down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/06/2018 at 06:42, mcmigo said:

Waddle.

 

A world class player who had played in champions league finals, world cups etc yet had his best couple of years performance wise at Wednesday.

 

Hirst was a fine player but ultimately was not at the level of some of the other strikers of his generation in the prem. I would take wright, shearer, Ferdinand, Sheringham over hirst. I wouldn’t have swapped waddle for another winger of that era

 

To be fair to Hirst, Wright, Shearer, Ferdinand, and Sheringham all played for better teams. Had we allowed Hirst to go to Man Utd, I think you'd have a different opinion.

 

As for the question, head says Waddle, heart says Hirst!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...