it's all about the witnesses...efl v us

[casbahowl]

38 minutes ago, Sonny said:

 

 

Shaun Harvey left his role as CEO of the EFL at the end of 18/19 season, before Rick Parry joined as chairman in Sept 2019. No overlap.

just a convenient coincidence then?

[Sonny]

Just now, casbahowl said:

just a convenient coincidence then?

 

Not exactly sure what you mean / implying?

 

Nev said Parry moved the guy on. If he’s talking about Harvey then they weren’t even there at the same time.

[Sergeant Tibbs]

2 hours ago, happy bunny said:

 

If true then Rick Parry's motives are questionable to say the least

 

 

 

Of not true the Rick Parry’s motives are unquestionable to say the least.

 

 

[casbahowl]

1 minute ago, Sonny said:

 

Not exactly sure what you mean / implying?

 

Nev said Parry moved the guy on. If he’s talking about Harvey then they weren’t even there at the same time.

Do you think the EFL were reactive or proactive in the appointment of Parry?

[Ian_D]

11 hours ago, Sergeant Tibbs said:

And as I’ve pointed out, there are plenty of reasonable Liverpool fans about. 

Call them Livertonians or Everpudlians and see them become a bit more unreasonable.

[Dick_Turpin]

4 minutes ago, casbahowl said:

Do you think the EFL were reactive or proactive in the appointment of Parry?

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/sport/amp/football/47278842

[Sonny]

6 minutes ago, casbahowl said:

Do you think the EFL were reactive or proactive in the appointment of Parry?

 

Well the previous chairman, Ian Lenagan, left EFL in Sept 2018 and they had an interim chairman until appointing Rick Parry a full year later. So I suppose they were quite (slowly) reactive to the fact they needed a new chairman because the old one had left.

 

What do you think? You didn’t really answer my question about what you’re saying / implying?

Edited April 12, 2020 by Sonny

[Dick_Turpin]

7 minutes ago, Sonny said:

 

Not exactly sure what you mean / implying?

 

Nev said Parry moved the guy on. If he’s talking about Harvey then they weren’t even there at the same time.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/sport/amp/football/47278842

 

Harvey had had his chips. 

[BARMYARMY2010]

11 hours ago, hasthagotanycheese said:

There are reasonable and fair minded people in any group of people just as there will be a portion of unreasonable and biased. Best to be safe and have nobody with any connection to Liverpool including Mr Parry involved with the judgement in our case.

Mr Parry won't have any involvement with "our" case,its an independent panel,one of which shall be the chairperson who is a qualified solicitor or barrister  a ‘member’ or ‘fellow’ of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators,

in either case with at least 5 years post-qualification experience who shall be appointed independently by the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (or such other body as the Board may from time to time determine); and the side panel who must be independent of the parties and able to render an impartial decision.

[Sergeant Tibbs]

7 minutes ago, Ian_D said:

Call them Livertonians or Everpudlians and see them become a bit more unreasonable.

Is that based on facts ? 
If not you’re on the wrong thread. 

[Dick_Turpin]

I suppose the whole of football conspiring against Wednesday explains the last 20 years. 

 

There’s a shadowy cabal of Scousers like the Illuminati or the Rothschilds at the head pulling all the strings of the New Football World Order.  All because of the Disaster or a grudge against Mark Pembridge’s hair or our failure to truly appreciate Steve Harkness. 

 

With the charges against the three amigos looking vulnerable the EFL case needed a helping hand to sow confusion. The Coronavirus is the nuclear option - an attempt to take down Wednesday that may have significant collateral damage.

 

Or maybe it’s just that we have been and continue to be a bit rubbish and a Chairman, who openly admitted to being in a bit of bother when he’d already apparently solved that bother, may or may not have pushed an accounting ruse a bit too far - something an independent tribunal will decide on.