KivoOwl Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Those Preston fans were right about AI's reluctance to use youth weren't they? Rather than name a kid on the bench, he chose to go with just six subs. Odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJMortimer Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Those Preston fans were right about AI's reluctance to use youth weren't they? Rather than name a kid on the bench, he chose to go with just six subs. Odd. Is Richard Hinds injured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Richard Hinds was the 7th sub, but reported ill late this morning, at which point the "kids" were already well on their way to Liverpool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wrightson Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 too tough opposition to be able to throw a kid in their. We'd need to be playing ossett albion for him to even think about putting a kid on their and even then he would have to go for experience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eckington owl Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 (edited) too tough opposition to be able to throw a kid in their. We'd need to be playing ossett albion for him to even think about putting a kid on their and even then he would have to go for experience Palmer would have stood his ground easily. Edit* but i've heard on the grapevine he's injured. Edited January 29, 2011 by eckington owl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave angel Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I think his thinking was that it was best not to expose younger players (even as part of a squad to just warm the bench) to a game that could well have resulted in a violently hostile atmosphere and indeed cost him his job. Not saying I agree like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darra Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Palmer would have stood his ground easily. he's injured Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippyowl Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Palmer would have stood his ground easily. Yep, it's a pity that he's injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KivoOwl Posted January 29, 2011 Author Share Posted January 29, 2011 Richard Hinds was the 7th sub, but reported ill late this morning, at which point the "kids" were already well on their way to Liverpool. Fair enough, but strange they didn't have a 19th man as back-up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ak15 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 This is nothing but more incompetence from Irvine. Surely you would have someone in as backup, even if you have no intention of using them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Bach Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 A place on the bench should be a reward. Maybe nobody deserved a place on the bench? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goh Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 If Hinds was I'll and the youth players already committed does it matter. You can only make three changes and I thought the bench was food enough. Incompetence....give me a break Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now