Ronio Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 . McGugan's contract runs up until 2016, so we would also have to pay up the remainder of his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/sport/11670792.Watford_will_consider_bids_for_McGugan_in_January/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 It also give westwoods wage at sunderland to be just over 10k similar to wickhams previous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I'm not so sure on the salaries though, one seems too low and the others seem too high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Me neither however it does better show a range etc. And i bet many are outof date. But maybe helps put things into context a bit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Even 8 or 10k is 400 to 500k a year thats an enormous annual salary for a championship player.. 20k is over a million quid. Would anyone really pay anywhere near that for westwood or mcgugan in championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I can see your point. Putting it that way makes a bit more sense in economical terms. Saying McGugan is on 10k a week, 2 years left on his contract puts his value at a straight 1 million in terms of paying up the remainder of his contact How much do reckon watford are asking for?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 (edited) We sign him on 10k. give em 250k fèe they save 1m plus 250 from swfc. he gets the same deal. Edited December 18, 2014 by Johnbloodaxe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Interesting. I'm just thinking back to the Tom Lees deal. We had to pay up the remainder of his contract, could be the same sort of set up. The fee could be anywhere from 250k to 1 million plus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Why we pay the contract terms to the player not the selling club. I.e. if he was on 10k for 3 years we simply pick up that deal. We pay him 10k for 3 years. Nothing to pay leeds. They just save 1.5million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 The selling club just mean they dont want to be left with any residual contract costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 We dont pay the contract plus a new salary. Just the contract costs are transferred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Yeah I can see the point you;re making, One thing is clear from the reports are that watford are willing to listen to any offers, which surely implies they want rid and he should be available at a knock down price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 (edited) Fingers crossed he really looks the part. Worked hard an saturday. And has real quality. Love to see him drenthe and hutch in side. Just need a sttiker added then. Edited December 18, 2014 by Johnbloodaxe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkeye Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Just think where we could have been now had we not pissed about trying to get Le Fondre on the cheap. . Not this again.. There's a difference between offering a price, and a player holding out for a deal from a club higher up the football pyramid. See also fryatt, Marshall, Kenwyne Jones etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Just need a sttiker added then. Don't Ikea sell them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scram Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 That website is a load of baloney. Also he was signed on a free so his own signing fee plus loyalty bonuses (also factor in his prospective promotion bonus) means that his current deal is very lucrative. He was also prised away from a club known to pay very good money. So he didn't sign for peanuts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichSheffWeds Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 That website is a load of baloney. Also he was signed on a free so his own signing fee plus loyalty bonuses (also factor in his prospective promotion bonus) means that his current deal is very lucrative. He was also prised away from a club known to pay very good money. So he didn't sign for peanuts! Talking sense on here gets you nowhere Scram. Unfortunately some people have got blinkers on and expect MM to bring him in whatever the cost. They cannot see that breaking the wages budget is not a smart move, they should remember how we got into a mess for the last 15 years. These people don't live in the real world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Of course people realise the financial implications. There's no way we could sign McGugan and Drenthe without making sacrifices. I'd happily chop in Westwood to procure those two and a striker. Keiren has been in scintillating form, and is better than Kirkland - but he's not millions of pounds better than Kirkland. I'd rather have our most valuable assets further up the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now