Elvin Parsnip Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Why didnt he put McCabe on now we have more space and their a man down - Semedo is just the same as Prutton - is he trying to draw - that's what my 10 YEAR OLD son asked me ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingOwl Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 When Semedo came on I actually thought I was dreaming. I thought SURELY Jones isn't bringing on our most defensive midfielder when we're drawing at home against the ten men of YEOVIL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lees Tom Cat Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 I would start with semedo..Can't understand all the hate towards him lately..The new scape goat by the looks of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 The Semedo substitution was for Prutton who had injured himself a few mins before in a sliding tackle The Palmer - JJ substitution was exactly what was needed. Unfortunately it came too late - should have been done at half time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingOwl Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 I would start with semedo..Can't understand all the hate towards him lately..The new scape goat by the looks of it. No no no, that's not the point we're making, we're not using him as scapegoat. Semedo is a decent player. But with 20 minutes left...against ten men...the last player you want to bring on to help get a goal is Semedo. The Semedo substitution was for Prutton who had injured himself a few mins before in a sliding tackle The Palmer - JJ substitution was exactly what was needed. Unfortunately it came too late - should have been done at half time Then why not bring McCabe on for Prutton, against 10 men we shouldn't be being so defensive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 I would have brought McCabe on for Coke - but Prutton did have to go off... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lees Tom Cat Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 No no no, that's not the point we're making, we're not using him as scapegoat. Semedo is a decent player. But with 20 minutes left...against ten men...the last player you want to bring on to help get a goal is Semedo. He put some of the best/only crosses in the box when he came on. People get obsessed with players positions on paper..But in reality he can do more than the position on paper tells you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eccy Owl Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 JJ for Palmer was spot on Semedo for Prutton...Should have been McCabe and should have been earlier Maghoma for Helan...Should have been Antonio and should have been a lot earlier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingOwl Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 He put some of the best/only crosses in the box when he came on. People get obsessed with players positions on paper..But in reality he can do more than the position on paper tells you. McCabe would've offered more I think. It just seemed a very negative substitution in my eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlsincefifties Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 The Semedo substitution was for Prutton who had injured himself a few mins before in a sliding tackle The Palmer - JJ substitution was exactly what was needed. Unfortunately it came too late - should have been done at half time It might have been a positive substitution but it caused the goal. JJ instead of going straight on to give cover to Spence as Palmer had been doing just ambled on the pitch towards Antonio to tell him to go to the right side because he was going down the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sheff Owl Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Jones subs have been have been very questionable all season so far. He just doesn't make the most of what he has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lees Tom Cat Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 (edited) McCabe would've offered more I think. It just seemed a very negative substitution in my eyes. Semedo and McCabe might be a good shout..With McCabe getting forward and Semedo sitting back..Doubt it will happen ..Be intresting to see it though. Edited September 14, 2013 by Dave The Builder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thornebranch Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 We should of gone with 3 at the back and an extra in midfield then we may of picked the second ball up abit more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elvin Parsnip Posted September 14, 2013 Author Share Posted September 14, 2013 McCabe was the blindingly obvious choice the whole ground could see it - he would have had space to play and got the ball down, played to Nuihu's feet and he could have linked up with the wide men who could have then put a few crosses in for him - instead hopeful balls coming straight back and our wingers chasing back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elvin Parsnip Posted September 14, 2013 Author Share Posted September 14, 2013 We should of gone with 3 at the back and an extra in midfield then we may of picked the second ball up abit more Yes he should have seen how they had set up and changed our formation after 10 mins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elvin Parsnip Posted September 14, 2013 Author Share Posted September 14, 2013 The Semedo substitution was for Prutton who had injured himself a few mins before in a sliding tackle The Palmer - JJ substitution was exactly what was needed. Unfortunately it came too late - should have been done at half time Would have preferred JJ on for Antonio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeder Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Should have taken Coke off earlier (was like playing with 10 men with him on), moved Palmer into the middle (at least he isn't poo scared of having the ball at his feet) put Antonio on the right where he is more comfortable and stuck JJ up with the Nuhiu. Then when Prutton was injured replaced him with Semedo.......IMHO :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE REF Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 JJ for Palmer was spot on Semedo for Prutton...Should have been McCabe and should have been earlier Maghoma for Helan...Should have been Antonio and should have been a lot earlier Antonio wont be subbed while ever jones has a hole in his arse... Antonio is Jones' love child Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now