4231

[Huge Dowd]

2 hours ago, joelswfc said:

Matching the blades for formation is definitely a possibility.

 

Having said that, a back 3 of Loovens, Pudil and Venancio terrifies me a bit.

 

If we line up with a 442 the fans might go into meltdown.

Football has evolved so much that 90% can't read the formation anyway.  I include myself in that before anybody pipes up.

Comments on seeing team sheet evidence this as do those at the match.

[joelswfc]

Just now, Huge Dowd said:

Football has evolved so much that 90% can't read the formation anyway.  I include myself in that before anybody pipes up.

Comments on seeing team sheet evidence this as do those at the match.

That is a good point. Often takes me a while at matches to work out the system. As long as the players understand what’s going on that’s all that matters!!

[slinger208b]

4 hours ago, dnhc said:

but would struggle to play the 'one up' in a 'one up and support system'.

hooper is a finished, he is at his best when feeding off someone, you can't tie a pedigree finisher to a carthorse job.

 

I suppose it depends how you see the formation, it isn't a carthorse job.

 

In attack it should be 433 with the outside midfielders playing as forwards, therefore supporting the one up who should be a clinical finisher.

 

Hooper has shown he has tricky feet and is capable of holding the ball to play others in...

Edited January 8, 2018 by slinger208b