Guest Big Guns Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 all these idiots who think when purse left our problems started ,let me tell you he was poo ,our best defender was tudgay ,how many times did he get our poo defence out of the poo ,irvine fooked up not letting the idiot purse go but our best player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wednesday-Wonderland Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 He didn't give a poo poo for the last 18 months. Right move for both him and the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Saturday Owl Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Tudders didn't give a poo , best for him to move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonofbert2 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 all these idiots who think when purse left our problems started ,let me tell you he was poo ,our best defender was tudgay ,how many times did he get our poo defence out of the poo ,irvine fooked up not letting the idiot purse go but our best player. There may be some truth in what you're saying but Tudgay didn't want to be here anymore. He himself has made this pretty clear since leaving. It was better for him and us that he went when he did. Didn't we have to pay him even more money for not being arsed anyway because of a clause relating to us being taken over? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Big Guns Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 There may be some truth in what you're saying but Tudgay didn't want to be here anymore. He himself has made this pretty clear since leaving. It was better for him and us that he went when he did. Didn't we have to pay him even more money for not being arsed anyway because of a clause relating to us being taken over? yes but my point is our defence as got worse sine tudders left ,not purse ,and why didnt mandric want to keep our best player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonofbert2 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 yes but my point is our defence as got worse sine tudders left ,not purse ,and why didnt mandric want to keep our best player It's only because he spent half his time dropping deep to cover the arses of a poo midfield. He wanted to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hack-Abusi Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 wtf is this poo poo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmyowl1212 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Agree with Big guns regarding defending but he wanted to go so it was no win either way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Big Guns Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 wtf is this poo poo? r8 chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manchester_Owl Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Should have kept him. Him being half arsed was and is better than the performances of every other player bar Osborne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Big Guns Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 well ibet we av to pay more 4 worse players than tudgay in the summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now