Jump to content

Reece James - why not? What's the problem Danny?


Recommended Posts

Like others, i wouldn't use James as a replacement for Johnson, but to play Marv further forward. The team then better balanced.

He is a steadier left-sided defender than either Marv or Akin and you can see oppo's targetting that area consistently with success as their lack of positioning nous, pace and concentration is clear. On the other flank, Pol's energy and Dom's physicality give a decent enough platform defensively and something to worry about when with the ball going forwards.

I guess James may be rusty but others have been indulged in other areas of the squad and either let us down (Fletcher and Wilks especially) or done a decent job when called upon.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think James is better than anything we have in the current formation.  We'd have ot play a back four and offer plenty of protection.  If we did play a back four, I'd sooner put Palmer at LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...