Awful

[Loppy]

9 hours ago, sheriwozgod said:

No width on the bench to call on 

 

We had width on the bench. We had to use it after 43 seconds when Wallaces hamstring went.

[sheriwozgod]

27 minutes ago, Loppy said:

 

We had width on the bench. We had to use it after 43 seconds when Wallaces hamstring went.

 

So you think it was a good idea to have THREE central strikers on the bench but no place for Buckley or McManaman ?

 

In a tight one off game where an ATTACKING winger can make a difference ( i dont know...... a bit like Quaner did last night) our wide option on the bench was Adam Reach , a hard working non tackling glorified full back.

[Loppy]

37 minutes ago, sheriwozgod said:

 

So you think it was a good idea to have THREE central strikers on the bench but no place for Buckley or McManaman ?

 

In a tight one off game where an ATTACKING winger can make a difference ( i dont know...... a bit like Quaner did last night) our wide option on the bench was Adam Reach , a hard working non tackling glorified full back.

 

I personally would have had one of those ahead of Nuhiu yes. But Quaner did one thing, ran past a fast asleep and shattered Pudil. Reach coming on at 70 mins rather than min 1 could have had the same impact.