Jump to content

So what happens if Wildsmith has a stormer;…


Recommended Posts

Just now, bradowl said:

For all Bolton's possession Wildsmith didn't have that much to do but did everything asked of him. 


The 2 punches at the end after there 2 quick corners were brilliant from Joe,  showed great decision making and confidence when we was working hard to close the game out 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old saying football the shirt is they’re for you to lose and you’ve got to take your chances 

 

I don’t know what message we’re sending out by dropping wildsmith for BFP

 

wildsmith starts next game for me 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit of a rock and a hard place this one

 

BPF is 100 times better but has made some absolute howlers 

 

Wildsmith is usually good for a handful of games but is usually good for a few howlers after about 4 games

 

That said - although I’m not a fan at all - I’d probably keep Wildsmith in. In the long run BPF feeling he can be dropped will be beneficial for us

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Royal_D said:


The 2 punches at the end after there 2 quick corners were brilliant from Joe,  showed great decision making and confidence when we was working hard to close the game out 

The 2 punches at the end after there 2 quick corners were a goalkeeper doing his job. 
 

Fixed it for you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, morganowl said:

wildsmith was a 6/10 today in a team of 5/10 performances . did ok thats all

and how good was it see after some recent 3s and 4s from peacock -farrell.........

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tricky one. Wildsmith wasn't tested enough to call today a stormer (he was probably better at Mansfield), but he's come in and done well.

 

I still think BPF is the better keeper, but what was a no-brainer a few weeks ago is now a bit of a throw up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, McRightSide said:

Bit of a rock and a hard place this one

 

BPF is 100 times better but has made some absolute howlers 

 

Wildsmith is usually good for a handful of games but is usually good for a few howlers after about 4 games

 

That said - although I’m not a fan at all - I’d probably keep Wildsmith in. In the long run BPF feeling he can be dropped will be beneficial for us

On what evidence is BPF 100 times better than wildsmith? He's been clown like in his last half a dozen games. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Drewswfc said:

On what evidence is BPF 100 times better than wildsmith? He's been clown like in his last half a dozen games. 


In all elements as shown by his all round performances and Wildsmith’s

 

Kicking, punching, shot stopping, organizing, anticipation 

 

Sure he’s dropped some major melons recently but he’s clearly a significantly better keeper

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

100 times better is such an absurd exaggeration.

 

Peacock Farrell has dropped clanger after clanger.

 

Joe isn't the long term answer either, but to suggest Peacock Farrell is some top keeper is absurd based on what we've seen so far.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SiJ said:

100 times better is such an absurd exaggeration.

 

Peacock Farrell has dropped clanger after clanger.

 

Joe isn't the long term answer either, but to suggest Peacock Farrell is some top keeper is absurd based on what we've seen so far.

Tbf, you could do with calming down a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...