Plonk Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 2 hours ago, HighworthOwl said: I think Gibson’s only interest in our case was because we were a direct rival for relegation. It was all about self preservation. If Derby are as dead and buried as people are predicting I doubt he will care. Yes I appreciate that, still think they might be rivals with the bottom clubs....and Gibson is definitely a bottom feeder 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raminpeace Posted August 18, 2021 Share Posted August 18, 2021 21 hours ago, beano said: On 2 July 2021, the EFL published the written reasons relating to an Independent Disciplinary Commission’s sanction verdict in respect of earlier proceedings between the EFL and Derby County. Alongside a financial penalty of £100,000, the Club received a reprimand as to its future conduct and was ordered to submit revised and restated accounts for the years ended 30 June 2016, 30 June 2017, and 30 June 2018 to the EFL by Wednesday 18 August 2021. Following constructive discussions between the Club and the EFL it has now been agreed to extend this deadline, with the necessary filings now required by Tuesday 24 August 2021. The EFL will be making no further comment on this matter at the current time. https://www.efl.com/news/2021/august/efl-statement-derby-county some speculation that the reason for the deferral is because we are about to play Boro at Derby and it could all have kicked off. I would quite like to see a fight between Morris and Gibson. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latemodelchild Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 16 hours ago, Raminpeace said: some speculation that the reason for the deferral is because we are about to play Boro at Derby and it could all have kicked off. I would quite like to see a fight between Morris and Gibson. Surely not? That would mean that Gibson is basically running the EFL and the EFL are scared of him wouldn't it? He does seem to be the one who is pushing for punishments etc but the EFL don't have to do what he says do they? I'd absolutely love to see boro get into trouble for overspending or summat. Pubehead goes on like they're completely innocent and run properly but I bet if the EFL wanted to they could find summat. They had parachute payments and failed to go up, he's bitter about that and doesn't like others having the advantage he had and wasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Malc Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 3 hours ago, latemodelchild said: Pubehead 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plonk Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 No light at the end of the tunnel still. Had to cancel U23s game because they couldn’t put a team out Deadline passed for submitting accounts ( though EFL say they have received some information....but it’s not the accounts) They got beaten by dem blades, and there’s not many can say that in the last few years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 They're doomed. Doomed! Doomed I tell ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agentwalker Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Just been mentioned that they've failed to submit the accounts which were due yesterday. That's now 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18 they need to resubmit and haven't. How are they getting away with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agentwalker Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Apparently they have submitted more information, but not the accounts. What they submitted? Some photos with the entire efl visiting epstein's or something? Dodgy as **** 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raminpeace Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 5 hours ago, Plonk said: No light at the end of the tunnel still. Had to cancel U23s game because they couldn’t put a team out Deadline passed for submitting accounts ( though EFL say they have received some information....but it’s not the accounts) They got beaten by dem blades, and there’s not many can say that in the last few years should have won that. two stupid errors again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raminpeace Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 4 hours ago, agentwalker said: Apparently they have submitted more information, but not the accounts. What they submitted? Some photos with the entire efl visiting epstein's or something? Dodgy as **** I think both sides have agreed in principle to try to resolve all matters so that there is no need for further appeals etc. derby are clearly relying on something in relation to the accounts which the EFL have asked for further evidence on. Once they are satisfied I expect the accounts will go in. if they can’t agree then this could be subject to further judgements and appeals. perhaps we are trying to pretend that we didn’t actually pay £4m for Anya or £6m for Bradley Johnson or £4.5m for Butterfield. Maybe none of those things ever happened and it was all just a dream. That seems more likely than having voluntarily agreed those fees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adem Poric Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Didn't you pay 10m for that Polish guy as well? How you've not had a points deduction is absolutely staggering. What were in the originally submitted accounts? Half finished word searches? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plonk Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 37 minutes ago, Raminpeace said: I think both sides have agreed in principle to try to resolve all matters so that there is no need for further appeals etc. derby are clearly relying on something in relation to the accounts which the EFL have asked for further evidence on. Once they are satisfied I expect the accounts will go in. if they can’t agree then this could be subject to further judgements and appeals. perhaps we are trying to pretend that we didn’t actually pay £4m for Anya or £6m for Bradley Johnson or £4.5m for Butterfield. Maybe none of those things ever happened and it was all just a dream. That seems more likely than having voluntarily agreed those fees. £4.5 m for butterfield? You should be getting investigated for money laundering. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
31Dec1966 Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 4 hours ago, agentwalker said: Just been mentioned that they've failed to submit the accounts which were due yesterday. That's now 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18 they need to resubmit and haven't. How are they getting away with this? And they should have been re submitted by 18th August. EFL gave them (yet another) extension to 24th August. It's a pity Bury didn't have Englands record goalscorer on the books......or at least being paid by a third party, allegedly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fudge27 Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Raminpeace said: I think both sides have agreed in principle to try to resolve all matters so that there is no need for further appeals etc. derby are clearly relying on something in relation to the accounts which the EFL have asked for further evidence on. Once they are satisfied I expect the accounts will go in. if they can’t agree then this could be subject to further judgements and appeals. perhaps we are trying to pretend that we didn’t actually pay £4m for Anya or £6m for Bradley Johnson or £4.5m for Butterfield. Maybe none of those things ever happened and it was all just a dream. That seems more likely than having voluntarily agreed those fees. I thought we'd wasted money. My word. Guess at least you guys had a few big sales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drewswfc Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Plonk said: £4.5 m for butterfield? You should be getting investigated for money laundering. Int nut house more like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markowl Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 3 hours ago, Adem Poric said: Didn't you pay 10m for that Polish guy as well? Mr Sheen? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANDY Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neo hippy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Take the deduction They're down already anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agentwalker Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 fizz me, if this was us holding back all these accounts they'd throw everything they could at us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
31Dec1966 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 1 hour ago, ANDY said: Hold on , Derby are allowed to negotiate their "settlement" ??? They are unlikely to agree to a 9 point deduction? Suppose they'd prefer no deduction . Were Macclesfield, Bury, and indeed, us allowed to negotiate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now