Dronfield Blue Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Just now, hirstyboywonder said: Unproven in the Premier League. Man City are looking at Kane leading the line for 3 or 4 years, they aren't phased by age and sell on clauses. Possibly. I wouldn't be disappointed if Kane arrived to be honest. I have a soft spot for City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 minute ago, Dronfield Blue said: Possibly. I wouldn't be disappointed if Kane arrived to be honest. I have a soft spot for City. From the manager losing his marbles to a not disappointing signing within a couple of days. Typical Owlstalk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 7 minutes ago, Dronfield Blue said: It would seem Barca and Real are happy to take that risk. Haaland for me all day long. I’d argue Kane has at least another 4-5 years at the top level, with the way modern day pros look after themselves Haaland is an unknown quantity, and although he’s a talent there’s no saying how he will develop over the years to come I can see the argument for both but it’s Kane for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dronfield Blue Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 2 minutes ago, Ellis Rimmer said: are they the same price? I don't know, can't be much in it. The one good thing is, if Pep went for Kane, you have most of the England forward line playing together every week. I'm sure Southgate could f00k that up though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dronfield Blue Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 minute ago, hirstyboywonder said: From the manager losing his marbles to a not disappointing signing within a couple of days. Typical Owlstalk! It's not meant to be serious. Haaland would be my first choice, Kane second. I'm not saying Kane is a bad player, far from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 5 minutes ago, Dronfield Blue said: It's not meant to be serious. Haaland would be my first choice, Kane second. I'm not saying Kane is a bad player, far from it. Given that you agreed with a poster saying £100M is a bizarre valuation for one of the most consistent strikers in European club football, what would you expect him to go for in todays market? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis Rimmer Posted June 22, 2021 Author Share Posted June 22, 2021 8 minutes ago, Dronfield Blue said: I don't know, can't be much in it. The one good thing is, if Pep went for Kane, you have most of the England forward line playing together every week. I'm sure Southgate could f00k that up though. "Just do what Pep told you to do" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dronfield Blue Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 minute ago, hirstyboywonder said: Given that you agreed with a poster saying £100M is a bizarre valuation for one of the most consistent strikers in European club football, what would you expect him to go for in todays market? Allegedly City have offered £100M, Levy values him at £150M. Probably around £125/130M Crazy money, but the going rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogers Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 City could afford both Kane and Haaland, so why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bannofan Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 12 hours ago, hirstyboywonder said: Given that you agreed with a poster saying £100M is a bizarre valuation for one of the most consistent strikers in European club football, what would you expect him to go for in todays market? I know you haven't asked me, but I would say £60 million Kane €100 million Haaland. Age has something to do with it for me. In four years time Kane at 30 might walk away for free or near enough, Haaland could be worth £150 million. I think they are both established as top club 'Number 9's' in Europe, along with Lewandowski and Lukaku . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis Rimmer Posted June 23, 2021 Author Share Posted June 23, 2021 2 hours ago, Bannofan said: I know you haven't asked me, but I would say £60 million Kane €100 million Haaland. Age has something to do with it for me. In four years time Kane at 30 might walk away for free or near enough, Haaland could be worth £150 million. I think they are both established as top club 'Number 9's' in Europe, along with Lewandowski and Lukaku . I wouldn’t put Lukaku in that tier because he did struggle in England and Italy is a worser league-Forestieri played regularly in it last season 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 19 minutes ago, Ellis Rimmer said: I wouldn’t put Lukaku in that tier because he did struggle in England and Italy is a worser league-Forestieri played regularly in it last season It's also often a tough league for strikers to bag loads of goals due to the often defensive nature of it. I'm not sure Nando started all that many for Udinese. In any event, he bagged one goal according to Wiki. No chance Kane is worth only 60 million in the transfer market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markg Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 21 minutes ago, Ellis Rimmer said: I wouldn’t put Lukaku in that tier because he did struggle in England and Italy is a worser league-Forestieri played regularly in it last season I still think it's harder to score goals in Italy than in England. Strikers in England get so many chances. So many dull high scoring games in England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis Rimmer Posted June 23, 2021 Author Share Posted June 23, 2021 14 minutes ago, markg said: I still think it's harder to score goals in Italy than in England. Strikers in England get so many chances. So many dull high scoring games in England. Well evidently not as Lukakus strike rate is much higher in serie a 17 minutes ago, SiJ said: It's also often a tough league for strikers to bag loads of goals due to the often defensive nature of it. I'm not sure Nando started all that many for Udinese. In any event, he bagged one goal according to Wiki. No chance Kane is worth only 60 million in the transfer market. I’m surprised he made as many appearances as he did even if it’s just coming on for 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markg Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 24 minutes ago, Ellis Rimmer said: Well evidently not as Lukakus strike rate is much higher in serie a I’m surprised he made as many appearances as he did even if it’s just coming on for 5 Lukaku has done well there but he also did well at Everton too. Many strikers look better here than they do in italy. Look at Salah. Did well in Italy but nowhere near as well as he has done here. the state of the defending in England is embarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis Rimmer Posted June 23, 2021 Author Share Posted June 23, 2021 32 minutes ago, markg said: Lukaku has done well there but he also did well at Everton too. Many strikers look better here than they do in italy. Look at Salah. Did well in Italy but nowhere near as well as he has done here. the state of the defending in England is embarrassing. Yeh he did well at Everton and not well enough at Man Utd, therefore I don’t think he would be in same tier as the other’s mentioned. I don’t think the defending in England is particularly embarrassing, there are some great defenders here. Top scorers in Italy scored more than those in England this last season. Old Ronaldo still out scoring Lukaku Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 He was crap again last night. A stat I’d be interested to see is how many goals against the big PL teams, and not the defences of Burnley, sheff utd, West Brom etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 12 hours ago, Bannofan said: I know you haven't asked me, but I would say £60 million Kane €100 million Haaland. Age has something to do with it for me. In four years time Kane at 30 might walk away for free or near enough, Haaland could be worth £150 million. I think they are both established as top club 'Number 9's' in Europe, along with Lewandowski and Lukaku . £60M in a market where Harry Maguire moves for £80M, Ousmane Dembele £115M. Higuain cost about £80M when he was 28. Haaland's age and potential for a sell on fee does add more to his worth but City don't really care about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scram Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 City are about winning trophies in the here and now - not developing players for resale As i outlined earlier Kane's career record is astonishing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IWEDFM Posted June 25, 2021 Share Posted June 25, 2021 I said it before the Euro's that Southgate should have done everything in his power to convince Vardy to come out of international retirement. I would rather have him upfront than DCL Kane must start as given a chance he will score. How many opportunities has he had? We've been so defensive that we've almost neglected attacking. Southgate is to blame and needs to change his tactics. All that attacking talent at his disposal and we couldn't break down an awful Scotland side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now