ANDY Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 Got mine tonight. Filled in and returned. hopefully they’ll get a resounding mandate to put some demands to Chansiri Wether he listens is another thing 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalmJimmers Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 Just submitted mine. Really well put together and detailed questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dowls Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 (edited) Horrible biased and agenda driven.. but form your own opinion Edited June 7, 2021 by dowls 2 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Theboylangers Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 3 minutes ago, dowls said: Horrible biased and agenda driven.. but form your own opinion Link doesn't work for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitechapel Owl Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 Just now, Theboylangers said: Link doesn't work for me. I don't think it will unless you're a Trust Member, as you need to login and each member can only submit their answers once. Half way through mine, interesting so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitechapel Owl Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 One of the questions Since our inception, the Trust has released many statements that contain robust criticism of the Chairman and his running of the Club. Despite this, the Trust has been studious in maintaining owner neutrality, our interventions in the debate through statements and media appearances been focused on securing positive changes in the way that the Club operates, rather than focussing on individuals. We receive many representations from members asking us to re-consider our policy of owner neutrality. Their belief is that the Chairman presents an existential threat to the future of the Club, and have genuine concern regarding his leadership and financial ability to operate the football club. We do not know what the possible repercussions of abandoning the policy of owner neutrality are, but we have to assume that they exist on a range of ‘no change’ to ‘the Club abandoning all contact with the Trust’. Q9. Would you like the Trust to abandon its policy of owner neutrality? * Yes - abandon the policy of owner neutrality - the Trust needs to take a stronger stand on Mr Chansiri's running of the Club No - maintain the policy of owner neutrality 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briggowl Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 55 minutes ago, Whitechapel Owl said: One of the questions Since our inception, the Trust has released many statements that contain robust criticism of the Chairman and his running of the Club. Despite this, the Trust has been studious in maintaining owner neutrality, our interventions in the debate through statements and media appearances been focused on securing positive changes in the way that the Club operates, rather than focussing on individuals. We receive many representations from members asking us to re-consider our policy of owner neutrality. Their belief is that the Chairman presents an existential threat to the future of the Club, and have genuine concern regarding his leadership and financial ability to operate the football club. We do not know what the possible repercussions of abandoning the policy of owner neutrality are, but we have to assume that they exist on a range of ‘no change’ to ‘the Club abandoning all contact with the Trust’. Q9. Would you like the Trust to abandon its policy of owner neutrality? * Yes - abandon the policy of owner neutrality - the Trust needs to take a stronger stand on Mr Chansiri's running of the Club No - maintain the policy of owner neutrality I'd imagine the whole point of the trust is to have a voice to DC from the fans. To jeopardise this and alienate him from the trust would be counterproductive. Yet he had to know we are seriously unhappy with his 'leadership' or lack of. hmmmmmm good question 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morepork Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 I’d urge fellow fans to join the trust. You may not agree with its structure or even everything it stands for but, it represents the single best opportunity for a unified voice against the existential threat that is this owner. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyCraig Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 The Trust must surely move against Chansiri as soon as possible, unless they know of something most of us don't regarding unpaid wages, late accounts, season ticket refunds etc.. The kid gloves approach has been tried, I was even in favour of it when I thought the Chairman could at least keep our club afloat, but the silence from him has been deafening while the house falls around us all. This vote is only going one way. Its time to get it out there in the local and national press that we don't have any faith left in him at all. Not one bit. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogers Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 3 hours ago, Whitechapel Owl said: One of the questions Since our inception, the Trust has released many statements that contain robust criticism of the Chairman and his running of the Club. Despite this, the Trust has been studious in maintaining owner neutrality, our interventions in the debate through statements and media appearances been focused on securing positive changes in the way that the Club operates, rather than focussing on individuals. We receive many representations from members asking us to re-consider our policy of owner neutrality. Their belief is that the Chairman presents an existential threat to the future of the Club, and have genuine concern regarding his leadership and financial ability to operate the football club. We do not know what the possible repercussions of abandoning the policy of owner neutrality are, but we have to assume that they exist on a range of ‘no change’ to ‘the Club abandoning all contact with the Trust’. Q9. Would you like the Trust to abandon its policy of owner neutrality? * Yes - abandon the policy of owner neutrality - the Trust needs to take a stronger stand on Mr Chansiri's running of the Club No - maintain the policy of owner neutrality Tough one this! It's either try to talk to him and get re-assurances or total all out anarchy; should be a c) give him 2 weeks to attend a meeting and spill the beans, if not then all out attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quinnssweetshop Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 The trust hasn't been robust in criticism at all. It has bent down to chansiri. Let's hope the trust stops playing at commitees and having meetings about meetings, and actually gets on with what's in the best interests of the club, not it's own standing. i believe in it, i'm a member, but it has to change it's approach to him. They've kissed his backside too long and spent too much time pontificating over the language of their messages. 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwë Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 I put to move against Chansiri, but also not to seek potential investors. I don't want another Ken Bates scenario. I put to move towards fan ownership. I also put to keep up with the engagement meetings for whatever good that will do, better in than out even if they are a waste of time. Can't remember the rest, but doing nothing presents the biggest risk to the future of our club. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwë Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 Oh, and I voted for more biscuits at meetings. 2 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Baggins Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 I can see it now when this is sent to DC through his representatives. Be like that scene where the top Nazi brass break the news to Hitler that the war is lost and he loses his mind. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopparberg Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 2 hours ago, Rogers said: give him 2 weeks to attend a meeting and spill the beans, if not then all out attack Tend to agree with this, but that’d be giving a deadline to a man that doesn’t do deadlines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogers Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 14 minutes ago, Kopparberg said: Tend to agree with this, but that’d be giving a deadline to a man that doesn’t do deadlines. Yep, I hold no hope of positive comms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hornsby Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 7 hours ago, Whitechapel Owl said: One of the questions Since our inception, the Trust has released many statements that contain robust criticism of the Chairman and his running of the Club. Despite this, the Trust has been studious in maintaining owner neutrality, our interventions in the debate through statements and media appearances been focused on securing positive changes in the way that the Club operates, rather than focussing on individuals. We receive many representations from members asking us to re-consider our policy of owner neutrality. Their belief is that the Chairman presents an existential threat to the future of the Club, and have genuine concern regarding his leadership and financial ability to operate the football club. We do not know what the possible repercussions of abandoning the policy of owner neutrality are, but we have to assume that they exist on a range of ‘no change’ to ‘the Club abandoning all contact with the Trust’. Q9. Would you like the Trust to abandon its policy of owner neutrality? * Yes - abandon the policy of owner neutrality - the Trust needs to take a stronger stand on Mr Chansiri's running of the Club No - maintain the policy of owner neutrality Yes, unless he offers Trust chance to have club shares. Like 108 Trusts do in UK clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morepork Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Kopparberg said: Tend to agree with this, but that’d be giving a deadline to a man that doesn’t do deadlines. He can’t spill the beans mate, if he publicly acknowledged how precarious our position is he’d have to throw the towel in. As it stands my guess is he intends to continue to trade from a position of insolvency*. If you can’t pay your debts on time you are insolvent in the eyes of the law. * And insolently @Grandad Edited June 8, 2021 by Morepork 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwellOwl Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 Submitted too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalthamOwl Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 7 hours ago, dowls said: Horrible biased and agenda driven.. but form your own opinion ha ha you’re funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now