Jump to content

BREAKING - Sheffield Wednesday players REJECT Chansiri's attempts to furlough them


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, fpowl said:

In terms of the players why no would they get an option to be furloughed 

 

basically chansiri puts them on furlough and claims 80% of 2.5k per month for all the squad earning that or above 

 

and then chansiri tops up the wages ( eventually himself )

 

he still has to pay them he just claims the furlough money back

 

dont see how this is a bad thing or why he would need to consult the players they are currently not working 

 

unless he’s asking them to train or given them a training programme to follow ( which they would have done ) 

 

them technically they are still working so he can’t claim furlough 

Does DC top up the remaining 20% up to £3,000 not cover the other £100,000 a month for Bannan, Westwood, Reach, or £125,000 for Rhodes. He would too up £500 a player a month, on our wage bill he would be saving millions each month.

 

He's the prat that did not loan out Rhodes in January when offers came in that would have saved him North of £500,000.

 

For me he get what he deserves, if he cannot pay the players they can hold him in breach of contract and the 12 players we have leftfield move with freedom of contract.

 

Lower your asking price to £1, DC, then get lost before we have no club left to save.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Guest Rodger said:

Can't fault him in trying to do what's best for the club now, can you? 

 

Arsenal, Spurs, Leeds even the former Champions Liverpool did so... 

 

Why shouldn't DC do the same? 

Because it’s either a) a genius move by a shrewd businessman trying to save swfc a few quid by using a legal loophole or b) a desperate attempt by a clueless owner yet again trying to bend the rules to save himself some money because he’s running the business into the ground through mismanagement. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly believe administration is not far off. 

 

Not paying the players THREE months in a row, and now trying a grab a few grand from the tax payer to put towards what little wages he can pay tells me he is skint. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, S36 OWL said:

 

These "wealthy" young men havnt been paid for THREE months 

They have been paid but late some clubs agreed wage deferral schemes with there players 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...