Big Jack Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 The sad fact is every club in the EFL is in debt. Unless you have an owner who has endless cash to throw away, no one has any income coming into the club. Of course we are badly run but it would be naive to think we are on our own. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 29, 2021 Author Share Posted May 29, 2021 3 hours ago, Beauchief Owl said: If they aren't going to lose money and it would help the club's cashflow problems, why have the players rejected the idea? They might even get paid quicker. All of this will not help recruitment either. Chansiri says he’s minted so it’s all ok 1 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jack Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 1 hour ago, Beauchief Owl said: Well at least they'd be getting £2,500 a month with the rest to come. Don't see a problem claiming what's entitled if it helps the club. Of course if your main aim is to make DC suffer then I can see why you would be against it, albeit at the expense of the club. Dont have a problem with using available schemes many others will be doing the same. Its more concerning of where will future finance come from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 29, 2021 Author Share Posted May 29, 2021 End of the day the players have rejected it so it ain’t happening Some might say that’s what you get for messing with people’s wages and then going cap in hand to them to help you out Others might says it’s Karma Others may even suggest it’s a very clear indication of whether or not the players have any faith whatsoever in the chairman 1 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlinexile Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 14 minutes ago, Asio otus said: Dont have a problem with using available schemes many others will be doing the same. Its more concerning of where will future finance come from. The furlough scheme was clearly not intended to help wealthy football club owners pay their players during the off season. This culture of 'lets see what we can get away with' has to end. It's already cost us a stadium and got us relegated. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jack Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 17 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: End of the day the players have rejected it so it ain’t happening Some might say that’s what you get for messing with people’s wages and then going cap in hand to them to help you out Others might says it’s Karma Others may even suggest it’s a very clear indication of whether or not the players have any faith whatsoever in the chairman No faith in the chairman whatsoever. Lack of clarity and info about how we are going to progress financially is a concern. No one knows so leaves s void for countless rumours. Its certainly a mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 29, 2021 Author Share Posted May 29, 2021 Im sure many of us have had bosses who have treat us with utmost respect, looked after us and our interests, made sure we were given a happy and positive environment that is set up for you to succeed And as a result you would do anything to repay that boss with loyalty and going over and above the call of duty in return You just would IF the boss had made sure the above happened as standard 1 1 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marro Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 Of our few remaining decent players like Iorfa and Windass I would be seeking an exit from this basket case club. DC seems to be facilitating this by not paying wages on time. If you were a player (and Wednesday was not your boyhood club) would you want to play for us if you were decent or instead play at a stable club which didn’t have this despot as owner? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 2 things. 1. Good for them, they do right. 2. Can you refuse to be furloughed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 Out of curiosity, why wouldn’t the players agree to this if their salary is being topped up anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parajack Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 58 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: Some of the fifteen players who were released - who spent months barred from training due to being furloughed - are now considering life outside football. "Are managers at potential new clubs going to take a chance on someone who hasn't played for six months?" asked Wood. "They've got mortgages and now they have to find a job in a pandemic. A lot of them have only known football. "I would say to young footballers - 'Have a trade. Learn on your days off. Have a back-up." Thats always been he way hasnt it,historically? remember using Alan Woodwards chippy walking home from Wisewood,with him frying the chips!! sure it was whilst he was still playing,he played whilst 78? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatzooma Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 17 hours ago, Guest Rodger said: Modern "professionals" for you. You'd think these wealthy young men would be too ashamed to kick up a stink, in the face of cut costing et al thanks to us now having to compete at a lower level which thanks in no small part to their utter ineptitude and spineless showings... I feel sorry for DC here as he's clearly trying to do right by the club. We need this swap drained and DC is just the man to do it. ICWT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatzooma Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 Will people stop slagging DC off. He is Fit and Proper and has certified to Run a football club...regardless of wether that’s into the rocks or not! He is Fit and Proper and Don’t forget that. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 29, 2021 Author Share Posted May 29, 2021 14 minutes ago, FreshOwl said: Out of curiosity, why wouldn’t the players agree to this if their salary is being topped up anyway? Exactly Whod have thought they’d be nervous around wages at SWFC eh?! 1 1 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jack Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 40 minutes ago, owlinexile said: The furlough scheme was clearly not intended to help wealthy football club owners pay their players during the off season. This culture of 'lets see what we can get away with' has to end. It's already cost us a stadium and got us relegated. Many owners no matter how wealthy cant have a bottom less pit of money without any income coming into the game. There are many corporation's who have claimed from this scheme when they can afford not to. At the end of the day the government have imposed lockdowns so only rightly so they should have to fork out for businesses who no income coming in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 1 minute ago, @owlstalk said: Exactly Whod have thought they’d be nervous around wages at SWFC eh?! I’m just wondering before you start, not supporting the decision whatsoever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 29, 2021 Author Share Posted May 29, 2021 16 minutes ago, FreshOwl said: I’m just wondering before you start, not supporting the decision whatsoever Heres part of the answer 1 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prowl Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 This furlough stuff seems odd to me. The players aren't 'not working' they are on holiday. "I'd like to take a week of my annual leave." "That's fine, we will put you on furlough". Surely that's not how it's supposed to work. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gob_Bluth Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 17 minutes ago, FreshOwl said: I’m just wondering before you start, not supporting the decision whatsoever I reckon the 7k pay they've been getting would be out of the window if they'd agreed to be furloughed, effectively meaning they'd be losing 4.5k over the 7k partial payment they're getting at the moment Just my theory mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quinnssweetshop Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 chansiris either skint and daddies cut off his trust fund for being stupid - or chansiris just a front man and paxo was there to oversee how funds were distributed - or chansiri doesn't give a t0ss anymore and has left the club to rot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now