Barry Bannan being subbed off

[@owlstalk]

23 minutes ago, Arthur Bach said:

 

Then our idea of hierachial structures in football must differ because the sanctity and integrity of management have been further eroded with the disclosure that a manager apologised for making a substitution. 

 

People looking (deliberately) for stuff that simply isn't there

 

Managers since I was a kid have told of times they've apologised to a player for taking them off for tactical reasons

 

But yeah - go head and try and use to to attack a brand new manager in his first week if it makes you feel good

Personally I think it's a bit tacky to do so

[@owlstalk]

 

 

 

 

I could find more but can't be arsed accommodating people looking to attack a brand new manager in his first week trying to use and manipulate something that just isn't what they're trying to make out it is

 

 

 

[Arthur Bach]

Yep.

 

Only going one way for Jose at Spurs.

 

#P45

[victorturner]

41 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

 

You can have whatever opinion you want

But come on - we've got a new manager in place and you're already throwing around stuff like that in his first week?
Just think it's a bit OTT and sad
Like I say though - if you want to do that go ahead - I won't applaud anyone doing something like that though

Darren Moore deserves and needs backing not slating in his first week 

Some of his decisions cannot be backed except by sheep. Supporting the new manager ought not include backing every early decision,  however blatantly foolish.

[@owlstalk]

3 minutes ago, victorturner said:

Some of his decisions cannot be backed except by sheep. Supporting the new manager ought not include backing every early decision,  however blatantly foolish.

 

 

Ok mate

 

I’m 100% behind the manager like almost  all Wednesday fans 

Shame a couple of others aren’t 

[Roscoe P. Coltrane]

Was a very confusing watch for the first 30 minutes 

One minute BB was chasing round their back 3 pressing 

Next minute he's taking the ball off Tom Lee's toes 

Where the fizz was he actually supposed to be playing?

[83owl]

2 minutes ago, Roscoe P. Coltrane said:

Was a very confusing watch for the first 30 minutes 

One minute BB was chasing round their back 3 pressing 

Next minute he's taking the ball off Tom Lee's toes 

Where the fizz was he actually supposed to be playing?

I think there’s maybe a difference from where he’s supposed to be playing and where he decides to play.

[debram]

4 hours ago, davey_wells said:

Moore will learn that Bannan is the only one with any ability in the squad, and how the rest of the players, because they are all so lacking in ability, completely rely on him.

And it showed when he went off. 

[Roscoe P. Coltrane]

1 minute ago, 83owl said:

I think there’s maybe a difference from where he’s supposed to be playing and where he decides to play.

Yes totally

Just did what he wanted in that 30 minutes..

[debram]

5 minutes ago, Roscoe P. Coltrane said:

Was a very confusing watch for the first 30 minutes 

One minute BB was chasing round their back 3 pressing 

Next minute he's taking the ball off Tom Lee's toes 

Where the fizz was he actually supposed to be playing?

He needs to be involved and on the ball, only way to do that with us is get it off the keeper or Tom Lees. 

[Roscoe P. Coltrane]

1 minute ago, debram said:

He needs to be involved and on the ball, only way to do that with us is get it off the keeper or Tom Lees. 

And do what?

[StudentOwl]

7 minutes ago, Roscoe P. Coltrane said:

Was a very confusing watch for the first 30 minutes 

One minute BB was chasing round their back 3 pressing 

Next minute he's taking the ball off Tom Lee's toes 

Where the fizz was he actually supposed to be playing?

He was definitely playing in the '3' in the 4-2-3-1

 

         Hutch           Shaw

 

Harris         Bannan       Windass

 

                  Patterson 

 

But as we know, he likes to play alongside Tom Lees, so it just meant he was mostly everywhere but there

 

 

[Guest Therealrealist]

Givin bannan that new contract when wer manergerless is looking very foolhardy

[debram]

Just now, Roscoe P. Coltrane said:

And do what?

Whatever, he's our best player surrounded by non descripts and that's the problem, you try playing in a team that is a step behind you all the time. 

[TheSlicer]

I personally think Bannan has signed the contract so that the club can get something for him. In return he would have got a signing on fee, good wages, and a release clause. All their wages will decrease upon relegation, and he will be confident that he will get somewhere else.

 

him and his mrs have only recently moved to Sheffield mind. 

[Roscoe P. Coltrane]

3 minutes ago, debram said:

Whatever, he's our best player surrounded by non descripts and that's the problem, you try playing in a team that is a step behind you all the time. 

What can our best player influence when he's 80 yards from the opponent's goal?

[@owlstalk]

4 minutes ago, Therealrealist said:

Givin bannan that new contract when wer manergerless is looking very foolhardy

 

It was done and rushed out to take the heat off the club after it was confirmed Liam Shaw was off to Celtic 

[debram]

5 minutes ago, Roscoe P. Coltrane said:

What can our best player influence when he's 80 yards from the opponent's goal?

Bobby Moore was England's best player, Moore said we were to play on the front foot, hardly, Shaw and hutch don't know what forward is, what chance has Bannan playing with this lot. 

[Rev Owl]

I'm not going to argue that Barry Bannan isn't a good player, he is.

However he's not indispensable, he has averaged 6 assists and 2 goals per season in his 6 seasons with us (including this one).

So far 15 other teams have been promoted to the Prem without having BB playing for them (I know not 15 different teams).

So if he gets subbed off its not the end of the world, Is it?

Edited March 6, 2021 by Rev Owl

[Hack-Abusi]

Nothing decision really

 

Dunno why people kicking up a stink

 

Guy wouldn't have changed **** all anyway