Popular Post Holmowl Posted March 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 6, 2021 ....why we binned playing two strikers with Reach left and Harris right? What exactly didn’t we like about those early crosses, resulting in goals, wins, points and table-climbing? What exactly do we like about the cleverer more modern formations and inverted wingers and wingers who aren’t wingers, that have seen us lose six in six? 32 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Owl999 Posted March 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 6, 2021 I’ve stopped caring, obviously the coaches see something the fans can’t 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Past Member Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 .....about how much crap, I posted about Lucas Joao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Joao's Tooth Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 4 minutes ago, Holmowl said: ....why we binned playing two strikers with Reach left and Harris right? What exactly didn’t we like about those early crosses, resulting in goals, wins, points and table-climbing? What exactly do we like about the cleverer more modern formations and inverted wingers and wingers who aren’t wingers, that have seen us lose six in six? "DINOSAUR TACTICS" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted March 6, 2021 Author Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, zzmdu said: .....about how much crap, I posted about Lucas Joao. Dont do yourself down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CircleSeven Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 I’m not sure why we stopped doing the one thing that was working. I don’t even think it would have kept us up but I quite enjoyed watching it. Hey ho. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 It worked for 2 games. A shellshocked Bournemouth, and Wycombe who are the only team as bad as us. What happened is Reach couldn’t care less and Harris has no end product 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatzooma Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 9 minutes ago, Holmowl said: ....why we binned playing two strikers with Reach left and Harris right? What exactly didn’t we like about those early crosses, resulting in goals, wins, points and table-climbing? What exactly do we like about the cleverer more modern formations and inverted wingers and wingers who aren’t wingers, that have seen us lose six in six? God knows but I’ve thought the same..it was terrible seeing Rhodes score 2 in 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Owl 2 Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 Like a ******** dog with a bone. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted March 6, 2021 Author Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, FreshOwl said: It worked for 2 games. A shellshocked Bournemouth, and Wycombe who are the only team as bad as us. What happened is Reach couldn’t care less and Harris has no end product You think it’s a coincidence that their 7 assists this season came from balls off Reach from the left and Harris from the right? And yet we’ve hardly played them in those roles in tandem. Do you think Harris on the left and Windass on the wing is working better? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted March 6, 2021 Author Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Belfast Owl 2 said: Like a ******** dog with a bone. Am I wrong? Is the “new” approach better? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Joao's Tooth Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, FreshOwl said: It worked for 2 games. A shellshocked Bournemouth, and Wycombe who are the only team as bad as us. What happened is Reach couldn’t care less and Harris has no end product All three of Harris' assists have come from the right Brentford, Bournemouth & Wycombe All of Reach's goals and assists have come from the left It's simple and effective not all this inverted winger nonsense. But it's not "modern" 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Owl 2 Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Holmowl said: Am I wrong? Is the “new” approach better? You are always ******** wrong. Never seen such propoganda from a poster in my puff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CircleSeven Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Holmowl said: Am I wrong? Is the “new” approach better? For me it’s a no and then another no. I’m just not young and forward thinking enough for modern football it would seem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grandad Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 16 minutes ago, Holmowl said: ....why we binned playing two strikers with Reach left and Harris right? What exactly didn’t we like about those early crosses, resulting in goals, wins, points and table-climbing? What exactly do we like about the cleverer more modern formations and inverted wingers and wingers who aren’t wingers, that have seen us lose six in six? And Hutchinson at CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grandad Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Belfast Owl 2 said: You are always ******** wrong. Never seen such propoganda from a poster in my puff. Mate, seriously, take a chill pill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poite Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 The problem was that with the balls coming into the box there was a danger that Jordan Rhodes might start scoring. He got a couple and we simply can't have that. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted March 6, 2021 Author Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Grandad said: And Hutchinson at CB Yep. 352 with Hutch at the back, Harris and Reach on their best side, two strikers. Worked well, but for reasons known only to Thompson we’ve stopped it. The 4231 is awful. Moore needs to see it by next week. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Owl 2 Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Grandad said: Mate, seriously, take a chill pill Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Owl 2 Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Holmowl said: Yep. 352 with Hutch at the back, Harris and Reach on their best side, two strikers. Worked well, but for reasons known only to Thompson we’ve stopped it. The 4231 is awful. Moore needs to see it by next week. Email him your stats about goals per minutes. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now