Al98 Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 If the new gaffa does end up reverting to his favoured 4-2-3-1 moving forward. GK - Westwood / Wildmsith RB - Palmer / Odubajo / Dawodu CB - Iorfa / Lees / Urhoghide CB - Dunkley / Borner / JVA / Brennan LB - Penney / Galvin CM - Luongo / Hutch / Pelupessy CM - Bannan / FDB / Hunt RW - Harris / Kachunga / Adeyonin CAM - Izzy Brown / Windass LW - Reach / Green ST - Rhodes / Marriott / Patterson Looks a lot more functional than the current formation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chow Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Scary that the majority won’t be here next season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZicoSterland2 Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Even thinking of picking Marriot is what scares me... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trev Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 No Shaw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodger Wylde Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Don't you just love the use of, 'moving forward'. 40 minutes ago, Al98 said: If the new gaffa does end up reverting to his favoured 4-2-3-1 moving forward. No. Just no. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigash_swfc Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 No Palmer in Center Mid? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jp1981 Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Mr. Chow said: Scary that the majority won’t be here next season Every cloud. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEdwards Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Westwood Palmer Urgohide Iorfa Harris Luongo Bannan Reach Brown Green Paterson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weshallovercome Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Mr. Chow said: Scary that the majority won’t be here next season Quote Not really, what is scary is who we end up replacing them with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobness Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 The proper lineup, moving forward 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
83owl Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 7 minutes ago, MrEdwards said: Westwood Palmer Urgohide Iorfa Harris Luongo Bannan Reach Brown Green Paterson Pretty sure Westwood is out for at least a month with broken ribs. Iorfa out for the season. Luongo - 2 weeks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CourteenerOwl Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 2 hours ago, Mr. Chow said: Scary that the majority won’t be here next season I would say its a relief more than being scared. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brando Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 3 hours ago, Al98 said: If the new gaffa does end up reverting to his favoured 4-2-3-1 moving forward. GK - Westwood / Wildmsith RB - Palmer / Odubajo / Dawodu CB - Iorfa / Lees / Urhoghide CB - Dunkley / Borner / JVA / Brennan LB - Penney / Galvin CM - Luongo / Hutch / Pelupessy CM - Bannan / FDB / Hunt RW - Harris / Kachunga / Adeyonin CAM - Izzy Brown / Windass LW - Reach / Green ST - Rhodes / Marriott / Patterson Looks a lot more functional than the current formation. Just been looking at players in this div out of contract at end of season..the right manager could but a good side together out of em.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieman Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Urgy at RB, he’s ahead of Palmer now for me. Urgy.......Lees......Borner......Reach(for now) ..............Hutch.....Shaw ......Windass....Brown...Bannan .....................Patto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Not sure what other people have seen, but I’ve seen enough of Paterson to know that he cannot play with his back to goal. He just isn’t able to do it, and to my mind, he would be better employed in the next row of three. His best performances for Cardiff, were when playing there, arriving late into the box, but always able to attack the ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 32 minutes ago, gurujuan said: Not sure what other people have seen, but I’ve seen enough of Paterson to know that he cannot play with his back to goal. He just isn’t able to do it, and to my mind, he would be better employed in the next row of three. His best performances for Cardiff, were when playing there, arriving late into the box, but always able to attack the ball Who is the better alternative playing with their back to goal then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CircleSeven Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Yes. We should definitely get our line up to move forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CircleSeven Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 6 minutes ago, pazowl55 said: Who is the better alternative playing with their back to goal then ? The players we didn’t sign in January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Crawshaw Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 17 hours ago, Al98 said: If the new gaffa does end up reverting to his favoured 4-2-3-1 moving forward. GK - Westwood / Wildmsith RB - Palmer / Odubajo / Dawodu CB - Iorfa / Lees / Urhoghide CB - Dunkley / Borner / JVA / Brennan LB - Penney / Galvin CM - Luongo / Hutch / Pelupessy CM - Bannan / FDB / Hunt RW - Harris / Kachunga / Adeyonin CAM - Izzy Brown / Windass LW - Reach / Green ST - Rhodes / Marriott / Patterson Looks a lot more functional than the current formation. Looks a good line up. 2 in the net and 3 players in every other position. We should smash everybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 24 minutes ago, pazowl55 said: Who is the better alternative playing with their back to goal then ? That’s the elephant in the room. Out of those we have, I would imagine Rhodes would be the best in a Darren Moore 4-2-3-1 system, especially if it’s played like he did at Doncaster, where it’s ball into feet. Of course Rhodes is far from ideal, but I think he’d give us the best cutting edge, but more importantly, it would allow Paterson and Windass to play in that second line. In his limited appearances for Norwich, Rhodes was used that way, understudying for Pukki As I said, not ideal, but in a 4-2-3-1 set up, it allows us to get our three most likely sources of goals into the side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now