Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Definitely a comfort zone thing if Reach does indeed sign, for me he doesn't deserve a contract and Bannan should be looking to further his career not stagnate with us 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not sure that the people who don’t see merit in Bannan and Reach’s abilities and performances and slate them after every defeat, will necessarily appreciate the talents of the types of players likely to replace them. I very much doubt they’ll be upgrades.

Edited by Everywhere & nowhere
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the right move to keep him in my eyes. Not the type of player needed in a dog fight and definitely not in league one. 
 

no doubt he will prove to a be a decent signing at another championship club if he did move on with better players around him but I’d rather have the 20/30k p/w to use on 2 or 3 other players 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

can we sign a 10 year old girl from the Young Owls as she'll have more bite, determination and won't get knocked off the ball as much as Reach.. He is so weak I'm sure traffic driving down Penistone Road knocks him over

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mcguigan said:

Sell him to who though?

 

Seriously can’t see anyone offering a fee for him.

 

He's a very decent winger with a decent reputation. Worth  a few million easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't /won't sign a striker in January 

Cant/won't get a manager in 

 

Resign losers reach, Hutchinson and bannan 

And people actually support the decison 

 

Best thing this club could do is move them on and actually look for players worth their wages and for a 3rd of the cost 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This club...

 

Apparently, we won't appoint a manager on a long-term contact as we are worried about the financial implications of relegation to League One. 

 

However, the club is going out of its way to renew the deals of some of its top earners. 

 

WTF. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SiJ said:

This club...

 

Apparently, we won't appoint a manager on a long-term contact as we are worried about the financial implications of relegation to League One. 

 

However, the club is going out of its way to renew the deals of some of its top earners. 

 

WTF. 

Well we’d be able to get fees for Reach and Bannan, even if it’s only half a mill each. We got offered 7 figures for Bannan last summer. So get relegated and ship them both out for a million in the summer makes sense vs letting them go for free. Just have to hope they don’t get injured or something 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LondonOwl313 said:

Well we’d be able to get fees for Reach and Bannan, even if it’s only half a mill each. We got offered 7 figures for Bannan last summer. So get relegated and ship them both out for a million in the summer makes sense vs letting them go for free. Just have to hope they don’t get injured or something 

I'm not sure renewing them for what will likely be very high wages (in League One) is really worth it for the sake of hypothetically receiving the sweet sum of f all for them down the line. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, 0742 said:

i'd love him gone. he doesn't play the type of football i enjoy and earns way too much for a league one club.

 

i also think he's the type of player who is just a bit of a mercenary.

 

I get that you don't like him but at least insult him in a way that makes sense.

 

You've called him a mercenary despite the fact that we are his second club and he's played close to 200 games for us.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Bannan’s contract was rushed through and announced to take the heat off Chansiri over the Shaw thing 

 

are we not allowed to say relegation now?

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, trev said:

 

He's a very decent winger with a decent reputation. Worth  a few million easy.

A decent winger who’s currently joint 70th in the assist stats.

 

Bog standard lower end Championship player these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Owl.1867 said:

 

I get that you don't like him but at least insult him in a way that makes sense.

 

You've called him a mercenary despite the fact that we are his second club and he's played close to 200 games for us.

 

Bit of a weird comment. I don't know the bloke to decide whether i like him or not, but i do know i don't like the slow, cumbersome, lack of intensity game he plays. I also don't like the fact he doesn't really excel in any position. 

 

And let's be honest, all footballers are mercenaries, they will play wherever they are paid the most. Reach is no different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Runs around a lot, often in the opposite direction to the football, but can put In a cross half a dozen times a season. 

 

Bar that spell a couple of seasons ago when he found his shooting boots, offers nothing. Can't tackle, positionally poor, can't beat a man or pass the ball. 

 

No thanks.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, 0742 said:

 

Bit of a weird comment. I don't know the bloke to decide whether i like him or not, but i do know i don't like the slow, cumbersome, lack of intensity game he plays. I also don't like the fact he doesn't really excel in any position. 

 

And let's be honest, all footballers are mercenaries, they will play wherever they are paid the most. Reach is no different.

 


Nah not having that 


You can't be labelling Adam Reach a mercenary and singling him out as one


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...