Jump to content

Class of 09/10 vs Class of 20/21


Recommended Posts

A question I’ve been thinking about a lot lately, but maybe a thread to revisit in May.
 

But who wins?

 

Most picked 11’s would be...

 

2009/10 

 

Lee Grant 

 

Lewis Buxton

Darren Purse

Mark Beevers

Tommy Spurr

 

Jermaine Johnson (5 goals)

Darren Potter (7 assists)

James O’Connor

Michael Gray

 

Marcus Tudgay (10 goals)(9 assists)

Luke Varney (9 goals)(6 assists)

 

That team finished on 47 points, averaging 1.02 points a game. 11 wins, 14 draws & 21 defeats. Michael Gray also credits the lack of professionalism in this team as the reason he ended up ‘hating football’.
 

vs..

 

2020/21 (as it stands) 

 

Kieren Westwood


Liam Palmer

Tom Lees

Joost Van Aken

Moses Odubajo

 

Kadeem Harris (3 assists)

Barry Bannan (4 assists)

Joey Pelupessy 

Adam Reach (3 goals)(2 assists)

 

Callum Paterson (6 goals)

Josh Windass (3 goals)

 

Currently bringing in 1.10 points a game, leading to a projected total of 51 points (excluding points deduction which makes it 45). 9 wins, 7 draws & 14 defeats.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funnily enough we are on exactly the same wins draws losses and obviously points as we were the year we went down. Difference being we had scored 15 more goals in 2009. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There at least seemed to be fight and leadership in the 09/10 team. 

 

I remember Purse screaming orders at players and JJ crying leaving the pitch after a mistake of his cost us points. They were poor but they cared. 

 

20/21 just don't seem to give a to55 at all. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

09/10 squad was bought on a shoe-string. They were poor but gave it a go.

 

This lot has cost an absolute fortune. And the end result will be the same.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at that 09/10 team it isn't that bad on paper.

Not World Beaters by any streach of the imagination but should not have gone down.

 

Current side is a mixture of not good enough, unbalanced and players over the hill.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, matthefish2002 said:

Looking at that 09/10 team it isn't that bad on paper.

Not World Beaters by any streach of the imagination but should not have gone down.

 

Current side is a mixture of not good enough, unbalanced and players over the hill.

 

 


If you go through the players outside the most picked 11 too there were players who genuinely came on and made a difference in games.

 

Leon Clarke or Elias Kachunga?

Ettiene Esajas or Jordan Rhodes?

Tommy Miller or Izzy Brown?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Animis said:

the 09/10 team was better than this one.

 

I'd say 02/03 one runs this one close.

Exactly - the current lot remind me of 02/03, right down to disastrous Chelsea loan signing (Leon Knight vs Izzy Brown) and a complete lack of cojones...

 

A typical line-up might be:

 

Pressman

Haslam    Westwood Bromby    Barry-Murphy

Hamshaw   MacLaren   Soltvedt    Quinn 

                         Owusu    Kuqi

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jonnyowl said:

09/10 team

 

I don't ever remember calling them spinless, gutless players!

 

 

 

I dont neither, now VVank was a word used.....definitely VVank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...