Jump to content

Kachunga vs Rhodes


Recommended Posts

Guest whowantstoberich
5 minutes ago, crookesowl said:

With Rhodes on pitch we have a striker who was doing OK, offered a threat from crosses and scored 2 in recent weeks. 
 

Then he is subbed off for Kachunga, who offered nothing again. 
 

I just don’t get it. Can someone explain please? 
 

 

Fresh legs. However agreed he is shocking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, crookesowl said:

With Rhodes on pitch we have a striker who was doing OK, offered a threat from crosses and scored 2 in recent weeks. 
 

Then he is subbed off for Kachunga, who offered nothing again. 
 

I just don’t get it. Can someone explain please? 
 

 


No.
 

Nobody can.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Grandad

(as if we haven't had enough injured players we are now bringing them in on season long loans)

Edited by Grandad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 0114 said:

For me Rhodes should have stayed on and Paterson should have come off for Windass rather than Kachunga. However, all in all we as a team just wasn’t at it yesterday. 

^^^ This.  I do think they can work as a partnership but not against sides that clearly have giants at the back like stoke. 
Second half was just awful. Just keep hoofing  it to their head the ball defenders and putting us back under pressure. 
For me needed windass to run the channels. 
Looking back was a poor team selection really. 
Thats NT’s job to analyse the opposition and pick a side to compete. We didn’t and could and should have lost by more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...