malek 3,098 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 57 minutes ago, SallyCinnamon said: Superb planning from the club yet again. Sack your manager right before a very important transfer window. True, only thing worst would be to let Pulis spend what little funds we have on tallest players he can find... 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Bluesteel 15,445 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 10 minutes ago, malek said: True, only thing worst would be to let Pulis spend what little funds we have on tallest players he can find... If they are decent then who cares Link to post Share on other sites
Hitcat 2,202 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 6 minutes ago, Bluesteel said: If they are decent then who cares They wouldn't be. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Sefton owl 1,598 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Huddersfield just signed Rolando Aarons. Cracking signing for them, it’s a shame we weren’t able to get him here permanently. 4 Link to post Share on other sites
malek 3,098 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 minute ago, Hitcat said: They wouldn't be. This Link to post Share on other sites
pazowl55 8,448 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 minute ago, Sefton owl said: Huddersfield just signed Rolando Aarons. Cracking signing for them, it’s a shame we weren’t able to get him here permanently. To be honest I don't think many were that bothered he didn't sign last time and he hasn't really progressed massively since then. Already have Harris and I wouldn't say he was better than him. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Bluesteel 15,445 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 21 minutes ago, Hitcat said: They wouldn't be. why wouldn’t they be and why would a shorter player be any better? Link to post Share on other sites
Bluesteel 15,445 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 20 minutes ago, malek said: This You have no clue who we would’ve been in for or able to attract. Link to post Share on other sites
swfc1983 3,183 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Nixon suggesting QPR have switched attention to Glenn Murray instead of Rhodes as it’s too dear. Surely it can only be down to wage contributions, we can’t be asking for a fee? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
prowl 10,586 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 38 minutes ago, Sefton owl said: Huddersfield just signed Rolando Aarons. Cracking signing for them, it’s a shame we weren’t able to get him here permanently. We had plenty of chances. As I remember it we could have signed him for nothing when his loan finished. Newcastle wanted shut of him. I thought he was a good player when we had him. Definitely looked good when he played. Link to post Share on other sites
pazowl55 8,448 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 5 minutes ago, swfc1983 said: Surely it can only be down to wage contributions, we can’t be asking for a fee? Would you like to put your money on it. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
prowl 10,586 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 5 minutes ago, swfc1983 said: Nixon suggesting QPR have switched attention to Glenn Murray instead of Rhodes as it’s too dear. Surely it can only be down to wage contributions, we can’t be asking for a fee? Are you sure DC isn't asking a fee for him? I'm not. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
pazowl55 8,448 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Just now, prowl said: Are you sure DC isn't asking a fee for him? I'm not. Probably wants the 10m back. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
vulva 29,772 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Maybe Rhodes didn’t want to move. Link to post Share on other sites
Beighton Owl 87 1,224 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Surprised Aarons has got a move to a Championship club. Didn't get much game time with loan spells at Motherwell and Wycombe last season. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
109Waddle 408 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 glen murray would be a good signing Link to post Share on other sites
yeadonowl 1,583 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 14 minutes ago, swfc1983 said: Nixon suggesting QPR have switched attention to Glenn Murray instead of Rhodes as it’s too dear. Surely it can only be down to wage contributions, we can’t be asking for a fee? If we gave Rhodes away we’d have to pay his contract up which at 26 weeks x 35k = 910k given Windass is injured pointless deal for us Link to post Share on other sites
Morepork 14,149 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 (edited) I don’t think being manager-less impacts on our transfer activity. It’s abundantly clear that manager input in our transfers is minimal. They just need to match the “Philosophy” DC referred to.........as he’s never elaborated on that I think it’s evolved from being old and overpaid to younger and occasionally not paid. Edited January 7 by Morepork 1 Link to post Share on other sites
malek 3,098 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 34 minutes ago, Bluesteel said: You have no clue who we would’ve been in for or able to attract. I have good idea how Pulis wants to play and what type of players he would look at. I could be wrong, but was dreading a prospect of him building a side to his liking. Link to post Share on other sites
prowl 10,586 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 5 minutes ago, yeadonowl said: If we gave Rhodes away we’d have to pay his contract up which at 26 weeks x 35k = 910k given Windass is injured pointless deal for us No, I don't think that is right. We would save his wages or at least whatever part of them QPR were prepared to pay. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now