Jump to content

12 points deducted and a ground sold...


Recommended Posts

Can't edit, anyway reason I asked was isn't this the same information released when the points were halved? Essentially saying the stadium sale should have mitigated the breach somewhat?

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, matthefish2002 said:

 

I think the EFL has just produced a report outlining why our 12 point deduction was reduced to 6.

 

So EFL released the same information that the tribunal released when the deduction was halved?

 

Just now, @owlstalk said:

 

 

 

Dig at what?

 

Apologies I thought the title + repeating the same information that was released a couple of weeks back was a dig, but apparently the same information was released again? Very strange.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Paul.. said:

 

So EFL released the same information that the tribunal released when the deduction was halved?

 

 

Apologies I thought the title + repeating the same information that was released a couple of weeks back was a dig, but apparently the same information was released again? Very strange.



Yeah not sure why it's come out just now - bit weird as it tells us nothing much new other than their reasoning


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:



Yeah not sure why it's come out just now - bit weird as it tells us nothing much new other than their reasoning

 

Ok good to see I'm not hallucinating in my confusion then! Thanks 🙂

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

To point out again that if the original tribunal had decided to dock us 6 points as the later tribunal said should have happened, then that would have been deducted last year.

 

This is because the original tribunal only moved the points sanction to this season as it would have relegated us unfairly in their opinion.

 

6 points wouldn't have relegated us. Logically therefore, the new tribunal should have retrospectively taken 6 points from 2019 20.

 

This is something that might interest the legals if we end up being relegated by 6 points or less this season.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Nero said:

This is something that might interest the legals if we end up being relegated by 6 points or less this season.

I would think we would have a very good case. No doubt the hierarchy will be hoping we ain't.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, alanharper said:

Imagine the kerfuffle had it all gone through a month earlier, they deducted 12 points last season when we looked safe and Monk relegated us, now they say it's a 6 point deduction.

 

This is precisely the argument of why they couldn't apply the deduction last season; it didn't allow the club an opportunity to appeal.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is interesting to note the sentence regarding " overspending by large amounts effects the integrity of the competition" --

 

so just what is the E.F.L 's view on parachute payments then, and why don't they do something about it

 

( preferably before the piggies rejoin us) !

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...