Mystic Neg Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 6 hours ago, mkowl said: Yes I meant Fisher but my post was more following on from the FF incident and how the FA chose to weight the merit of the (lack of) evidence. That ought to be easy, Fisher is obviously a full weight bellend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marconi Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 11 minutes ago, Beighton Owl 87 said: Alex Neil doesn't know where the clip has surfaced from as the game wasn't televised. How does he think fans are watching the games these days? Tried a dodgy stream on Saturday, ended up with iSwallow. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smhouston Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 On 21/11/2020 at 19:42, @owlstalk said: They're obvs mates having a laugh Dont' they know each other really well? Find it a bit disturbing you find it ok. Would you do that to both your male and female mates and expect them to be fine with it? His reaction alone shows he was uncomfortable with it. It's sexual assault. It may only seem minor to some, but what someone currently has issues down there which they are privately dealing with? Not cool at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, smhouston said: Find it a bit disturbing you find it ok. Would you do that to both your male and female mates and expect them to be fine with it? His reaction alone shows he was uncomfortable with it. It's sexual assault. It may only seem minor to some, but what someone currently has issues down there which they are privately dealing with? Not cool at all Errrr I've not said it's ok in the slightest In this very thread I've said it's absolutely NOT ok So chill Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 46 minutes ago, Beighton Owl 87 said: Alex Neil doesn't know where the clip has surfaced from as the game wasn't televised. How does he think fans are watching the games these days? That's really strange Maybe he doesn't have broadband Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LondonOwl313 Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 2 hours ago, Alan said: The incident has absolute nothing to do with race so I don't know why you harping on about it - you are drawing attention to race to harp on about old news, when the only thing that should really be being examined is the sexual harrassment/assualt. It was a topical joke given how much the authorities love to label people by their ethnicity and divide us. This is the big problem in this country now, too many people have no sense of humour and take everything literally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 1 minute ago, LondonOwl313 said: It was a topical joke given how much the authorities love to label people by their ethnicity and divide us. I think you're digging a hole here mate Probs best leaving it at this point x Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 Alex Neil covering himself in glory on this one, then: "I'll be honest I don't even know where the clip has come from or what the source of it is, because obviously the game wasn't on TV. You know what it is like on social media, as soon as something is posted and it catches a bit of fire - the next thing it becomes the biggest boiling point. But again, it will as quickly die off as quickly as it came - that's what happens, it becomes the 'thing' to watch and then a day later there's something else that captures everybody's attention." F*ck me. One of his players carries out a sexual assault and his main concern is how the footage got out there, then tries to dismiss it as merely a social-media storm. It's not a 'thing' to watch, you daft tw*t - it's a sexual assault. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bulgaria Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 42 minutes ago, Mystic Neg said: That ought to be easy, Fisher obviously felt a full weight bellend Fixed it for ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shetland Owl Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 10 match ban min Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Baggins Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 That Fisher has always annoyed me when he has played against us. Always cheating, diving, rolling around and timewasting. He seems to have it in for us. Seems he has well and truly dropped a bolloock here (excuse the pun) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest whowantstoberich Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 Season ban! Minimum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darra Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 1 hour ago, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said: Alex Neil covering himself in glory on this one, then: "I'll be honest I don't even know where the clip has come from or what the source of it is, because obviously the game wasn't on TV. You know what it is like on social media, as soon as something is posted and it catches a bit of fire - the next thing it becomes the biggest boiling point. But again, it will as quickly die off as quickly as it came - that's what happens, it becomes the 'thing' to watch and then a day later there's something else that captures everybody's attention." F*ck me. One of his players carries out a sexual assault and his main concern is how the footage got out there, then tries to dismiss it as merely a social-media storm. It's not a 'thing' to watch, you daft tw*t - it's a sexual assault. He's doing that because he knows his player is in deep do do. If the FA don't act what sort of message for that send out? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agentwalker Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 Fisher is one of them players who you get 2-0 up in a game with 2 mins left, you then throw on your crappiest chopper Harris type play and tell him to leave one on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiamAP22D Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 Mucky Queer I'd have backed Patterson 100% if he'd chinned him for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 25 minutes ago, darra said: He's doing that because he knows his player is in deep do do. If the FA don't act what sort of message for that send out? True, but in descending order of honourable responses, it goes: 1) Call out Fisher for a blatant sexual assault, wish Paterson well, and accept whatever sanction's coming his player's way. 2) Say you won't be responding as the FA are currently looking into the matter, so it wouldn't be appropriate. 3) Ponder how footage of your player carrying out a sexual assault got into the public domain in the first place, then dismissively claim that all the fuss will soon die down, as that's just the nature of social media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darra Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 If hed done it once he might have got away with saying it was bit of a laugh doing it twice means he was a) trying to get a reaction out of Paterson b) trying to get Patersons phone number or c) coming out in the most public way possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beighton Owl 87 Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 10 minutes ago, LiamAP22D said: Mucky Queer I'd have backed Patterson 100% if he'd chinned him for that. Wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darra Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 Just now, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said: True, but in descending order of honourable responses, it goes: 1) Call out Fisher for a blatant sexual assault, wish Paterson well, and accept whatever sanction's coming his player's way. 2) Say you won't be responding as the FA are currently looking into the matter, so it wouldn't be appropriate. 3) Ponder how footage of your player carrying out a sexual assault got into the public domain in the first place, then dismissively claim that all the fuss will soon die down, as that's just the nature of social media. Maybe but as is the way you'll get players in grass roots football including kids grabbing each others tackle for a laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Baggins Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 13 minutes ago, LiamAP22D said: Mucky Queer I'd have backed Patterson 100% if he'd chinned him for that. Nice to see we have time travelled back to the 80's with that type of comment. idiot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts