Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, WalthamOwl said:


yes I agree. Just except this now and move on. 


Your either guilty or not though ? How can there be an inbetween ? 
 

the owner is adamant he is in the right, everyone laughed and said he was delusional ... the arbitration panel clearly saw flaws in the EFL’s claim ? How

can they give -6 ? On what grounds ? Your not guilty ? Take the 12 off then .. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, hirstyboywonder said:

 

Why?

Were you one of those who thought we shouldn't have appealed as well?


No. Just don’t want it dragging on. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Beighton Owl 87 said:

Tried having a look on there need to be signed in to read the thread. Not worth the hassle. 

Yeah, the exact same thing they criticise this forum for.

Edited by SiJ
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Inspector Lestrade said:

 


I suspect that although the Arbitration panel have agreed with the original decision that we shouldn't have included the stadium sale in the 2017/18 accounts the clubs belief that it had permission to do so has been viewed as mitigating circumstances which should have been taken into account when determining the punishment.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...