Jump to content

Garry Monk chose the new signings. The Chairman has fully backed Garry Monk this season


Recommended Posts

Just now, erowl said:

 

Don't get upset mate ... you're getting the action you hoped for ... 5 pages already

 

Be happy with the traffic

 

lol

 

 

 


Not about the traffic - never is - don't need it


Now - how's about discussing the topic and that we signed a player with a leg broken in  two places?

  • Haha 1

 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, LondonOwl313 said:

This Dunkley wouldn’t get in the side anyway in a 4-4-2 (which we should be playing). Not ahead of Iorfa, Flint or Lees. So we’re missing a squad filling crock and that’s the reason he’s not being backed. Right...

 


Ah ok so it's fine to sign him then?

 

That's fine with you?

It's ok with you that he passed a medical?

 

Okayyyyyy then


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:


Christ almighty

 

2020 - the year when Wednesday fans condone the signing of a player with a leg broken in two places and more metal in his leg than in a skipyard


I don’t condone it. We wouldn’t ever get a sniff of signing a fully fit Dunkley. He’s one signing, a gamble, we’ve got first team players starting who’d never kicked a ball in anger in professional football, they are gambles too. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, whowantstoberich said:

Btw of course he chose the players, its foolish to believe otherwise.

It isn't the players fault though. It's the tactics.

 

Monk has been backed, they are his players, and I don't think any of them are bad players for the money spent. 

 

Similar story to Jos. He brings in Joey Pellupessy. He's not a bad player for the money spent, but the tactics of Jos and Monk are dire. Neither have no effective attacking outcome.

 

There are teams in this league who manage to score goals without a Fernando Foresteri or Anthony Knockaert. Just look at Wycombe and Luton in the last two games.They always looked like creating chances.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ZicoSterland2 said:

 On the Dunkley point if Monk wasn't involved why did he thank him for his part in the transfer ?


Eh?

Do you know how PR/Media works?

The manager's tend not to go  to the press and say 'this is a TERRIBLE signing - his leg is broken in two places!!!"


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, whowantstoberich said:

 

 

Getting a proven championship manager in, whatever the cost, would be the best investment he could ever make.

I've said repeatedly that the most important priority for spending is on the manager because

A) they are still cheaper than the good players 

B) they have the most influence on the team.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 


Not about the traffic - never is - don't need it


Now - how's about discussing the topic and that we signed a player with a leg broken in  two places?

 

Yeah - shocking scouting from Garry Monk

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:

 


Ah ok so it's fine to sign him then?

 

That's fine with you?

It's ok with you that he passed a medical?

 

Okayyyyyy then

Well depends what the medical team said and the cost involved so can work out the risk. Not privy to either of those pieces of information.

 

Just think that it’s irrelevant because he’s a back up player and wouldn’t make a difference.

 

Im more concerned with why we haven’t signed a left back, a target man, and why we resigned Pelupessy in midfield and are left with no adequate centre mid back ups, nor proven goalscorer (Rhodes aside)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LondonOwl313 said:

Well depends what the medical team said and the cost involved so can work out the risk. Not privy to either of those pieces of information.

 

Just think that it’s irrelevant because he’s a back up player  

 



You do realise he was signed to be captain of Sheffield Wednesday though right?


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:



Yep

When Dunkley hopped into the ground, with his legs setting off the metal detectors, that was clear evidence we'd given Garry Monk TOO much backing

Why do you continually defend the indefensible? Record shows he is the worst manager in our history

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:


Eh?

Do you know how PR/Media works?

The manager's tend not to go  to the press and say 'this is a TERRIBLE signing - his leg is broken in two places!!!"

The topic covers all the signings , you seem to be sticking to one. I think it very unlikely Monk had no involvement in the recruitment of any of them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, meggoisgod said:

Why do you continually defend the indefensible? Record shows he is the worst manager in our history

 

 

 

Did you not understand the first post in this thread mate?

Did you not see the last bit  about his record?


If it's too complicated for you maybe sit this one out


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...