Popular Post shandypants Posted October 21, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted October 21, 2020 No intended disrespect to Hunt but maybe Pelupessy ought to have been brought on in the first half when it became apparent that the game was passing Hunt by. I thought that Pelupessy was one of the few positives tonight. 25 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveyboy66 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Just now, shandypants said: No intended disrespect to Hunt but maybe Pelupessy ought to have been brought on in the first half when it became apparent that the game was passing Hunt by. I thought that Pelupessy was one of the few positives tonight. Agreed that's why we got back in the game for the first 25 mins of the second half...after that they stopped trying to get forward quickly and held on to the ball 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 At least he gets stuck in, Hunt needs a season on loan in league 1 or 2. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 3 minutes ago, shandypants said: No intended disrespect to Hunt but maybe Pelupessy ought to have been brought on in the first half when it became apparent that the game was passing Hunt by. I thought that Pelupessy was one of the few positives tonight. If he's a positive then God help us. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRightSide Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Can’t believe he started Hunt He’s looked so out of his depth in most games he’s played 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Theboylangers Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Just now, McRightSide said: Can’t believe he started Hunt He’s looked so out of his depth in most games he’s played He's good at pointing though. He does it a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevorhg Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 It was unfortunate that Luongo was missing tonight. He plugs the hole in the middle that was there for the first half. Pelupessy did well when he came on but either he or Deli-Bashiru should have been employed in that area for the whole game. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopparberg Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 He did good in a physical and tackling sense, but he’s not great controlling the ball. It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owly Mowly Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Pelupessy was the obvious replacement for Luongo. Can only pass short and sideways but he does put himself about tackled well 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyTrev Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, McRightSide said: Can’t believe he started Hunt He’s looked so out of his depth in most games he’s played Looked decent enough against Man City last season, unlike Pelupessey. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mrbluesky Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 5 minutes ago, McRightSide said: Can’t believe he started Hunt He’s looked so out of his depth in most games he’s played Agree with that, what does it say about Joey though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieman Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Agree, thought he did well. He and we know his limitations, but he tackled well and was miles better than Hunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beswetherick Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Hunt looks like a player when he’s got the ball, but he’s got a lot of work to do on his game without the ball 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, McRightSide said: Can’t believe he started Hunt He’s looked so out of his depth in most games he’s played Yet some would happily have waved Bannan off because we have got Hunt to come in and is ready to do so now! Bannan instrumental in the build up to our goal again, as he has been in all our league goal except for the first one. Pelupessy helped us be more compact without the ball today, but to back bringing him on with bringing on Dele Bashiru for Windass was a bit negative when we needed a goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRightSide Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Just now, hirstyboywonder said: Yet some would happily have waved Bannan off because we have got Hunt to come in and is ready to do so now! Bannan instrumental in the build up to our goal again, as he has been in all our league goal except for the first one. Pelupessy helped us be more compact without the ball today, but to back bringing him on with bringing on Dele Bashiru for Windass was a bit negative when we needed a goal. Agree JP for Hunt worked I cannot fathom the other two changes at all Monk is soooo bad at subs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizzard1867 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, Owly Mowly said: Pelupessy was the obvious replacement for Luongo. Can only pass short and sideways but he does put himself about tackled well Blinding obvious after what Loungo was asked to do in the last game, and the success of that role. Any way, it's what Wednesday do best in big games on Sky. New experimental line ups and formations. Sheffield Wednesday. The team who refuse to be defined. (New marketing tag line for Elev8te) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emilianenko Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Hunt is not a defensive midfielder 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sefton owl Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 I barely noticed him and windass were on first half tbh 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4evaowl Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 He had a good game when he came on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumi Shimamoto Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 34 minutes ago, shandypants said: No intended disrespect to Hunt but maybe Pelupessy ought to have been brought on in the first half when it became apparent that the game was passing Hunt by. I thought that Pelupessy was one of the few positives tonight. I wouldn’t go that far, but it needed a tackler in there. Luongo has turned out to be really good in that role, but we’ve needed cover for Hutchinson (when he was playing) since Lopez left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now