Jump to content

Sheffield Wednesday's stance on Keiren Westwood justified according to Dom


Recommended Posts

Screenshot 2020-10-20 at 12.35.01.jpg

 

Sheffield Wednesday's stance on Keiren Westwood justified according to Dom

 

The battle for the No 1 jersey was a close run thing, according to Monk. Both Dawson and Wildsmith were given game time in their limited pre-season programme. There was no Owls lifeline thrown to fans favourite Keiren Westwood, who is still out of favour and not been allocated a squad number. His last competitive outing came 11 months ago against West Bromwich Albion.

 

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/football/news/keiren-westwood-sheffield-wednesday-omission-19133157

 


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The headline doesn't really match the article, as far as I can see.

 

There's one solitary mention of Westwood in the article itself, yet he features in the headline and the accompanying image.

 

I'm not sure why an article which is fundamentally about the impressive start Dawson has made to the season needs framing in that way.

 

Seems a bit odd.

 

Anyway, Dawson has looked pretty assured so far and must be delighted with the start he's made. Hopefully he'll grow in confidence as the season progresses and start to truly fulfil the potential he undoubtedly has.

Edited by areNOTwhatTHEYseem
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said:

The headline article doesn't really match the article, as far as I can see.

 

There's one solitary mention of Westwood in the article itself, yet he features in the headline and the accompanying image.

 

I'm not sure why an article which is fundamentally about the impressive start Dawson has made to the season needs framing in that way.

 

Seems a bit odd.

 

Anyway, Dawson has looked pretty assured so far and must be delighted with the start he's made. Hopefully he'll grow in confidence as the season progresses and start to truly fulfil the potential he undoubtedly has.

He’s also put brown in his team for tomorrow when Monk said no one injured is back this week.

 

Strange one is Dom 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doom fishing again.

 

Had one yesterday about an update on the appeal. The update was there was no update.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said:

The headline doesn't really match the article, as far as I can see.

 

There's one solitary mention of Westwood in the article itself, yet he features in the headline and the accompanying image.

 

I'm not sure why an article which is fundamentally about the impressive start Dawson has made to the season needs framing in that way.

 

Seems a bit odd.

 

Anyway, Dawson has looked pretty assured so far and must be delighted with the start he's made. Hopefully he'll grow in confidence as the season progresses and start to truly fulfil the potential he undoubtedly has.

All because they know putting Westwood in the title will get more clicks than Dawson. 

 

Rubbish. 

 

At least this time next year there will be none of this to talk about, with Westwood, Rhodes etc gone. 

 

Then it will truly feel like a clean slate. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, WhiteOwl91 said:

All because they know putting Westwood in the title will get more clicks than Dawson. 

 

Rubbish. 

 

At least this time next year there will be none of this to talk about, with Westwood, Rhodes etc gone. 

 

Then it will truly feel like a clean slate. 

 

If that's the reason, it's pretty shortsighted; all it will do is put people off reading their articles in the long run.

 

No doubt there's a story to be told regarding Westwood. Unfortunately, despite initial appearances, this article isn't it.

 

More importantly for me, it must be frustrating for Dawson that even his recent good form is only being reported through the lens of Westwood's absence by certain parts of the local press.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Round and round we go.......

 

Dawson and wildsmith both not good enough and the clubs struggling financially yet we’re happy to pay high wages for a player without even so much as a squad number. 
 

we’ve got a player on Westwood capable of winning us points...but the club are happy to cast him aside. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wednesday_Jack said:

Round and round we go.......

 

Dawson and wildsmith both not good enough and the clubs struggling financially yet we’re happy to pay high wages for a player without even so much as a squad number. 
 

we’ve got a player on Westwood capable of winning us points...but the club are happy to cast him aside. 



Let it gooooooooo

Let it gooooooooooooooo

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, WhiteOwl91 said:

All because they know putting Westwood in the title will get more clicks than Dawson. 

 

Rubbish. 

 

At least this time next year there will be none of this to talk about, with Westwood, Rhodes etc gone. 

 

Then it will truly feel like a clean slate. 

 

Given that we still have threads about George Hirst, Hutchinson, and Nuhiu knocking around the first few pages of this section, I wouldn't hold my breath on that front of I were you.

 

:duntmatter:

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Andrew_Owl said:

Dom with another fascinating and insightful article. 

Where's that? I didn't see one.

 

I don't mind Dom he's ok but this one was nothing more than click bait.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, @owlstalk said:



Let it gooooooooo

Let it gooooooooooooooo

 

Doom started it. 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Wednesday_Jack said:

Round and round we go.......

 

Dawson and wildsmith both not good enough and the clubs struggling financially yet we’re happy to pay high wages for a player without even so much as a squad number. 
 

we’ve got a player on Westwood capable of winning us points...but the club are happy to cast him aside. 

To suggest the club is “HAPPY” to be paying Westwood, is totally ludicrous. 

Why do you write stuff like that?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...