billyblack Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 11 minutes ago, Harrysgame said: Think some just panic about anything. Most of us have mortgages. Similar thing. DC sees the downturn in revenue, so obtains some funds, so not going to his own pocket all the time. Many businesses have funding for tough times or expansion etc etc. Stop panicking. Dont panic. We are a well run club. We all know that..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwinowl Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 My missus is a mortgage advisor good luck in getting one before next Xmas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mkowl Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 9 hours ago, hirstyboywonder said: Sole director doesn't appear as a director of any other companies but a search of Nigel Weiss finds this company http://www.goodforsport.com/index.cfm Seems they are the middlemen not the actual finance company - which will be interesting to see which entity is levying the legal charge in due course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theowlsman Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 The bigger mess is Reach getting games up front. Everything else will take care of itself. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyblack Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 58 minutes ago, RichSheffWeds said: Haven’t read this thread. I think there are a couple of points worth making for balance. The vast majority of very wealthy individuals don’t keep hundreds of millions in cash. That would be financial madness and a massive drag on investment performance so their wealth is usually in assets which they either don’t want to encash for various reasons (like tax liabilities on crystallisation) or because they are illiquid (like property). Secondly, most very wealthy individuals use debt to manage their position for the reasons above. Have chelsea taken loans out against their ground? Dont know, just asking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Tibbs Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 12 hours ago, mcmigo said: 13 pages of moaning and speculation and no solutions. Typical owlstalk. i am late to this thread as I am actually doing something about this. So far , no tuna have bitten on the rod I am dangling in the pond down the road but at least I am out there doing something unlike you keyboard warriors. Whilst you were typing you missed 2 good bites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mid Wicket Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Its never dull supporting Sheffield Wednesday UTO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdan2003 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 The article this morning in the star with Maguire, to which he says there is “nothing to panic about” 12 hours after stirring the pot, and making a very weak comparison to Bassini (because he happened to use the same football finance firm once) is the reason the bloke gets pelters on here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobayashi Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 So long as the terms of the lease are secure and so long as they keep to those terms then SWFC as the lessee can be indifferent about the identity of the lessor or about how the lessor has funded the purchase of the asset. It could matter if the lease terms protecting SWFC use of the asset are weak; if they cannot fulfil lease terms such as rental payments or if they as the lessee are joined to the charge along with Sheffield 3. In these cases a lessor default could be significant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, bigdan2003 said: The article this morning in the star with Maguire, to which he says there is “nothing to panic about” 12 hours after stirring the pot, FACT CHECK TIME HI @bigdan2003 - please can you explain how he in any way 'stirred the pot'? Thanks Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the monk Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 20 minutes ago, Jakes Grandad said: Its never dull supporting Sheffield Wednesday UTO You ever watched em play? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N0rtherner Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 12 hours ago, A12owl said: Some think the same about Monk. Not all though. Name one person who thinks Monk will come good. I'm not sure I think it, but I hope for it to happen. Don't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share Posted October 7, 2020 19 minutes ago, bigdan2003 said: The article this morning in the star with Maguire, to which he says there is “nothing to panic about” 12 hours after stirring the pot Just to clarify for all readers reading this and about to agree, Maguire DID NOT POST OR TWEET ONE SINGLE TIME ANYWHERE about this So was not 'stirring the pot' NOT ONE POST from Maguire NOT ONE SINGLE TWEET from Maguire THIS is why people bashing experts, pundits and journalists aren't taken seriously on here anymore Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdan2003 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 10 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: Just to clarify for all readers reading this and about to agree, Maguire DID NOT POST OR TWEET ONE SINGLE TIME ANYWHERE about this So was not 'stirring the pot' NOT ONE POST from Maguire NOT ONE SINGLE TWEET from Maguire THIS is why people bashing experts, pundits and journalists aren't taken seriously on here anymore eh? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdan2003 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 11 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: Just to clarify for all readers reading this and about to agree, Maguire DID NOT POST OR TWEET ONE SINGLE TIME ANYWHERE about this So was not 'stirring the pot' NOT ONE POST from Maguire NOT ONE SINGLE TWEET from Maguire THIS is why people bashing experts, pundits and journalists aren't taken seriously on here anymore “not tweeted once about this” Well theres a whole thread here sausage 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share Posted October 7, 2020 Just now, bigdan2003 said: eh? Oh dear... OH DEAR Okay... Can I repeat my question to you WHERE - ANYWHERE ON THE INTERNET - WAS MAGUIRE 'STIRRING THE POT'??? He didn't make a single post He didn't do a single tweet anywhere So come on.. how exactly was Maguire stirring anything? Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share Posted October 7, 2020 Just now, bigdan2003 said: “not tweeted once about this” Well theres a whole thread here sausage LOOK AT THE DATE THAT WAS LAST NIGHT Jeeeeeeeesus Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mkowl Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 30 minutes ago, kobayashi said: So long as the terms of the lease are secure and so long as they keep to those terms then SWFC as the lessee can be indifferent about the identity of the lessor or about how the lessor has funded the purchase of the asset. It could matter if the lease terms protecting SWFC use of the asset are weak; if they cannot fulfil lease terms such as rental payments or if they as the lessee are joined to the charge along with Sheffield 3. In these cases a lessor default could be significant. Having read the EFL disciplinary case and our aptitude to paperwork completion I am fairly nervous. Saying that a finance company would look at the same lease to assess its risk position The fear is more that at some stage the ownership of the stadium could be divorced from the football club. That never seems to end well ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdan2003 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Just now, @owlstalk said: Oh dear... OH DEAR Okay... Can I repeat my question to you WHERE - ANYWHERE ON THE INTERNET - WAS MAGUIRE 'STIRRING THE POT'??? He didn't make a single post He didn't do a single tweet anywhere So come on.. how exactly was Maguire stirring anything? hang on I’ve just quoted you where you said “he’s not tweeted about this” (assuming you meant he hasn’t tweeted about the subject) And I’ve just proven he has tweeted about it. Why do you get so defensive about these things? Call it an opinion, plenty of people will agree as plenty will disagree. I think he’s stirring the pot. You don’t The end. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mkowl Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 14 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: Just to clarify for all readers reading this and about to agree, Maguire DID NOT POST OR TWEET ONE SINGLE TIME ANYWHERE about this So was not 'stirring the pot' NOT ONE POST from Maguire NOT ONE SINGLE TWEET from Maguire THIS is why people bashing experts, pundits and journalists aren't taken seriously on here anymore But those defending them or believe every word uttered are equally not taken seriously - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now