Jump to content

Chey Dunkley - October 20th


Recommended Posts

Dunkley, one of six summer arrivals, has not played in a competitive match since last February because of a serious double leg break.

 

He is likely to be pitched into the under-23s before making his senior bow. The next game for Lee Bullen's side is on October 20 - a potential date that Monk feels is doable.

 

Speaking about Dunkley last week, Monk said: "Chey went to see a specialist for a regular check with his injury and he was delighted with it.

"He has had pins removed which was always part of the process.

 

"When you have been out for quite a long period, it is about making sure you build minutes in the right way. We want him back as quickly as we can but we have to do what is right by him.

 

"We are probably looking at after the international break for him to kick on into training."

 

 

 

Full injury list -  https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/football/news/sheffield-wednesday-injury-update-squad-19055373?fbclid=IwAR2fCfU8ajk7w_7FC1qaJYksMsX_K5n0IEc2a4EEEgLES-YxQX7CBdqwFZ0

 

 

 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 0114 said:

Got to say I thought he was a lot closer to fitness when we signed him than it appears to be. 
 

I like Dunkley as a player and you can see he’s a top guy. But should the club have been signing a player in our current predicament that’s not looking to be playing until a minimum of November?

 

Especially with an injury as serious as a double leg break, no one knows if he'll come back as good as he was, not even Dunkley.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, 0114 said:

Got to say I thought he was a lot closer to fitness when we signed him than it appears to be. 
 

I like Dunkley as a player and you can see he’s a top guy. But should the club have been signing a player in our current predicament that’s not looking to be playing until a minimum of November?

I would rather us be cautious with him than rush him back like previous management teams have with injuries.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if he's a little further along than being stated. He was definitely kicking a ball in training but I imagine no contact.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 0114 said:

Got to say I thought he was a lot closer to fitness when we signed him than it appears to be. 
 

I like Dunkley as a player and you can see he’s a top guy. But should the club have been signing a player in our current predicament that’s not looking to be playing until a minimum of November?


100% agree. Imo we should never have been signing a player that was still out with a double leg break. 

Edited by WalthamOwl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unbelievable, Jeff !

 

We’ve a 12 point deficit to make up and it is essential that we get off to a flying start.

 

We need people that can hit the round running, not someone who hasn’t played since mid February.

 

As a previous poster has quite rightly said - a bizarre signing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...