Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So far goals have been hard to come by but did we do the right thing in releasing these players

The players released dont seem to have pulled up any trees so far 

 

Winnal - not played yet for Oxford

Fletcher played 3 no goals

FF played 2 no goals

Dave played 3 goals 1

 

But we have saved £££££ on wages

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shetland Owl said:

So far goals have been hard to come by but did we do the right thing in releasing these players

The players released dont seem to have pulled up any trees so far 

 

Winnal - not played yet for Oxford

Fletcher played 3 no goals

FF played 2 no goals

Dave played 3 goals 1

 

But we have saved £££££ on wages

Winnall a goalscorer ?

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, agentwalker said:

we could have Kane and Ronaldo up front, neither will score in our current team.

We made shedloads of Chances in the games so far and haven't put them away so your post is nonsensical

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lawrie Madden said:

We made shedloads of Chances in the games so far and haven't put them away so your post is nonsensical

So why not play Rhodes, he thrives on chances and played in the first win and draw games. 

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shetland Owl said:

So far goals have been hard to come by but did we do the right thing in releasing these players

The players released dont seem to have pulled up any trees so far 

 

Winnal - not played yet for Oxford

Fletcher played 3 no goals

FF played 2 no goals

Dave played 3 goals 1

 

But we have saved £££££ on wages

 

Absolutely none of them were prolific goalscorers, though. And to varying degrees, age, injury and attitude counted against them. The only one I would have kept is Dave, and that have based on his professionalism and value as an impact player off the bench.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lawrie Madden said:

We made shedloads of Chances in the games so far and haven't put them away so your post is nonsensical

I must've been watching different games 'cos the last two games in particular have been sh1t3. We've had 5 shots on target over the two games.  

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, debram said:

So why not play Rhodes, he thrives on chances and played in the first win and draw games. 

Because Monk won't play him , 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, archieswfc said:

I must've been watching different games 'cos the last two games in particular have been sh1t3. We've had 5 shots on target over the two games.  

i was thinking same . there keeper didnt hardly touch the ball. neither did bristol city keeper week before. the system 352 with the currant players wont get 30 goals this season. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, trevdi9 said:

Because Monk won't play him , 

 

Exactly, his line ups, substitutions etc just don't make sense at times

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, debram said:

So why not play Rhodes, he thrives on chances and played in the first win and draw games. 


Rhodes thrives on ‘specific’ chances. Crosses coming into the box and front foot football.

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Swiss Toni said:


Rhodes thrives on ‘specific’ chances. Crosses coming into the box and front foot football.

He's not for us then. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Roy Of The Roasters said:

 

Absolutely none of them were prolific goalscorers, though. And to varying degrees, age, injury and attitude counted against them. The only one I would have kept is Dave, and that have based on his professionalism and value as an impact player off the bench.

Dave...was awful..

Hes gone..move on..ffs.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, agentwalker said:

we could have Kane and Ronaldo up front, neither will score in our current team.

 


It was the same when Rhodes and Nuhiu were up front but people crucified the strikers at the time


 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Lawrie Madden said:

Winnall a goalscorer ?

He was one season, and it made Forestieri mad, because Winnall was doing what Forestieri was doing, for probably a fraction of the price, there was a row, and we dumped Winnall, never saw Forestieri score 11 again.  Wonder what would have happened by keeping Winnall, and dumping FF?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Neon Nick said:

He was one season, and it made Forestieri mad, because Winnall was doing what Forestieri was doing, for probably a fraction of the price, there was a row, and we dumped Winnall, never saw Forestieri score 11 again.  Wonder what would have happened by keeping Winnall, and dumping FF?

Well done on rewriting history

 

Can I suggest you get in touch with the club before they do their next accounts?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...