Jump to content

Beaten by the better team


Recommended Posts

Literally the only thing that changed was they went a little more direct and dropped the ball in and around van Aken.

 

Luongo and Bannan were great first half and dominated, so they cut them out, targeted van Aken and that was that.

 

They didn’t even bother trying with Iorfa.

 

They just isolated Van Aken and he messed up multiple times - conceding possession, switching off, shape went to pieces.

 

Simple game

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we matched them first half, without ever really looking like scoring.

 

Once they scored, there was no way back and it was effectively game done and dusted.

 

My car won’t go anywhere if there’s no petrol in it. Similarly we won’t get anywhere without any decent established strikers who can pressurise defenders and create and take chances. 
 

It’s not rocket science

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our capitulations in second halves are shocking. For some reason we lose energy and drop deeper, handing the initiative to the opposition and leaving our attack completely impotent. 

 

It's either attitude, fitness or tactics as we've done it for a long time now in the vast majority of games. 

 

Abysmal second half and Monk had no clue how to change it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Spondon Owl said:

Its as simple as that i think. Man to man, not much in it, but their forward line was much more potent than ours. If we don't solve our striker crisis this is going to be a long difficult season. 

Yes, despite our hard work, they have more talent!

 

Today the talent beat the hard work!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Spondon Owl said:

Its as simple as that i think. Man to man, not much in it, but their forward line was much more potent than ours. If we don't solve our striker crisis this is going to be a long difficult season. 

We were also over run in midfield especially second half. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, debram said:

We were also over run in midfield especially second half. 

We were overrun in midfield because their “free” defender in the back 3 stepped into the midfield and carried the ball drawing a midfielder leaving it 2 on 3 in the middle 

out free defender is Tom lees who didn’t and never does this 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jonestown83 said:

We were overrun in midfield because their “free” defender in the back 3 stepped into the midfield and carried the ball drawing a midfielder leaving it 2 on 3 in the middle 

out free defender is Tom lees who didn’t and never does this 

Don't think you have a free defender when playing a back 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Garry monk performance

 

We are incapable of playing for 90 minutes

 

3 games without a goal now too 

But let keep signing non strikers to play striker it makes perfect sense right 

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...