Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, hasthagotanycheese said:

Limited. Keep sucking up the Chansiri myth and clapping. If we weren't so badly run we wouldnt need to be kept afloat.

If Chansiri left and we went into admin we would get a points deduction. Oh hang on a minute, we already have a points deduction.....whos that down to? Yes its our own Del Boy running everything like a real life TITCO.

Sooner Chancer Chansiri is out of S6 the better. I see no evidence of him being anything other than a spoilt rich boy without the foggiest idea of how to run a football club.

 

Clapping?

 

Jesus, it always comes down to that with our simpletons, give your head a shake mate.

 

So you get your wish and DC packs up in a huff and refuses to put another penny in, then what Einstein?

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The_Limit_Owl said:

 

Clapping?

 

Jesus, it always comes down to that with our simpletons, give your head a shake mate.

 

So you get your wish and DC packs up in a huff and refuses to put another penny in, then what Einstein?

 

 

Limited. Its always the same with the Chansiri fanboys on here.....they need to give their head a wobble too. Give us some evidence about what a brilliant businessman DC is because none of it has been on display at S6 recently.

 

We are all well aware of what would happen if DC left. Same as the recent situation at Wigan. However somebody would come in and pick up the pieces. We are already on minus 12 and probably heading to League 1 next year under DCs stewardship anyway.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, hasthagotanycheese said:

Limited. Its always the same with the Chansiri fanboys on here.....they need to give their head a wobble too. Give us some evidence about what a brilliant businessman DC is because none of it has been on display at S6 recently.

 

We are all well aware of what would happen if DC left. Same as the recent situation at Wigan. However somebody would come in and pick up the pieces. We are already on minus 12 and probably heading to League 1 next year under DCs stewardship anyway.

 

Fanboys!?

 

The hatred towards DC continues, sad, really sad.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Children's hospital on the home shirt please. They yellow went well on the stripes, and makes such a refreshing positive change to other teams with betting companies or middle east travel. Would be nice to start being the charitable club and build a rep from it.

Away kit can go with Elev8 or whatever for the cash injection. Can't imagine a championship shirt is really worth sponsoring at the moment as it is.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Kopparberg said:

Wonder if it’s harder to get the same money for a sponsor - now that there’s no fans in the grounds. 


is there not an increase in games on TV? Or is that just the premiership. 
 

seeing a sponsor on TV is easier than seeing it in the ground with my dodgy eyes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BowOwl said:

Children's hospital on the home shirt please. They yellow went well on the stripes, and makes such a refreshing positive change to other teams with betting companies or middle east travel. Would be nice to start being the charitable club and build a rep from it.

Away kit can go with Elev8 or whatever for the cash injection. Can't imagine a championship shirt is really worth sponsoring at the moment as it is.

 

It actually makes sense to do something like this, instead of a "CHANSIRI" default, why not give the sponsorship up to one of the local hospitals/charities, Bluebell Wood suits our colours! 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheOwlsofDodworth said:

I've figured out the OT equation. 

 

If all posters give their head a wobble or shake, it will restore karmic balance. 

 

 

 

If we do it all at once it may generate a seismic fault!  Especially if the head wobbling is in sync, like if you make repetitive movements in the bath....watta everywhere!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is absolutely nothing wrong with having Chansiri or any other of his companies on our shirts as long as he only pays the going rate, around 400k tops I believe and it obviously helps re. FFP.

 

The EFL found nothing wrong with any of that stuff plus the stadium sale itself and we were only found guilty of spending too much.

 

The last time we gave the sponsorship away to SCH when we really did need the fuckingmoney it was spoiled by the chairman who gave it away leaking to the Yorkshire Post that we hadn’t paid SCH up yet.

 

MM gave away sponsorship for a full season in anticipation of a deal that never came through so therefore we were never paid.

 

I’ve said it before but our more recent shirt sponsors tell the story of our club.

 

By all means sell it to someone willing to pay for the privelege but don’t assume that having any Chansiri group company on there is some sort of freebie.

 

The End.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, sonofbert2 said:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with having Chansiri or any other of his companies on our shirts as long as he only pays the going rate, around 400k tops I believe and it obviously helps re. FFP.

 

The EFL found nothing wrong with any of that stuff plus the stadium sale itself and we were only found guilty of spending too much.

 

The last time we gave the sponsorship away to SCH when we really did need the fuckingmoney it was spoiled by the chairman who gave it away leaking to the Yorkshire Post that we hadn’t paid SCH up yet.

 

MM gave away sponsorship for a full season in anticipation of a deal that never came through so therefore we were never paid.

 

I’ve said it before but our more recent shirt sponsors tell the story of our club.

 

By all means sell it to someone willing to pay for the privelege but don’t assume that having any Chansiri group company on there is some sort of freebie.

 

The End.

Yeh, but you're a "fan boy, clapper" and need to give your head a wobble or summat.............. Well according to that cheese fella anyway. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sonofbert2 said:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with having Chansiri or any other of his companies on our shirts as long as he only pays the going rate, around 400k tops I believe and it obviously helps re. FFP.

 

The EFL found nothing wrong with any of that stuff plus the stadium sale itself and we were only found guilty of spending too much.

 

The last time we gave the sponsorship away to SCH when we really did need the fuckingmoney it was spoiled by the chairman who gave it away leaking to the Yorkshire Post that we hadn’t paid SCH up yet.

 

MM gave away sponsorship for a full season in anticipation of a deal that never came through so therefore we were never paid.

 

I’ve said it before but our more recent shirt sponsors tell the story of our club.

 

By all means sell it to someone willing to pay for the privelege but don’t assume that having any Chansiri group company on there is some sort of freebie.

 

The End.

^^^^^ this 100% 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, The_Limit_Owl said:

 

It actually makes sense to do something like this, instead of a "CHANSIRI" default, why not give the sponsorship up to one of the local hospitals/charities, Bluebell Wood suits our colours! 

Or and this is a little out there so bare with me, we get a proper company to sponsor us so we can get some income into the club to help with the P&S rules we have to abide by. Stoke who still get parachute payments also get £9m a season for the naming rights to their stadium and their shirts could we not do the same for lets say a company run and owned by member of DC family. who could legitimately put in anything up to £5m a season without the EFL being overly bothered.

 

I am all for charity but lets have that sponsorship when we are getting £100m a season for taking part in the premier league. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, room0035 said:

Or and this is a little out there so bare with me, we get a proper company to sponsor us so we can get some income into the club to help with the P&S rules we have to abide by. Stoke who still get parachute payments also get £9m a season for the naming rights to their stadium and their shirts could we not do the same for lets say a company run and owned by member of DC family. who could legitimately put in anything up to £5m a season without the EFL being overly bothered.

 

I am all for charity but lets have that sponsorship when we are getting £100m a season for taking part in the premier league. 

Do you think Chansiri is putting his name on the shirt for free ?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, room0035 said:

Or and this is a little out there so bare with me, we get a proper company to sponsor us so we can get some income into the club to help with the P&S rules we have to abide by. Stoke who still get parachute payments also get £9m a season for the naming rights to their stadium and their shirts could we not do the same for lets say a company run and owned by member of DC family. who could legitimately put in anything up to £5m a season without the EFL being overly bothered.

 

I am all for charity but lets have that sponsorship when we are getting £100m a season for taking part in the premier league. 

Room,you've been banging that "mythical, multi million" sponsorship drum for ages. 

Other than Stoke's pre-existing deal with their owners, who else in the Championship has a multimillion shirt/ground sponsorship deal.? 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TheSlicer said:


is there not an increase in games on TV? Or is that just the premiership. 
 

seeing a sponsor on TV is easier than seeing it in the ground with my dodgy eyes. 

 

Don't think there's much difference in the number of televised Championship games and if last Saturday is anything to go by we will have people switching off! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, room0035 said:

Or and this is a little out there so bare with me, we get a proper company to sponsor us so we can get some income into the club to help with the P&S rules we have to abide by. Stoke who still get parachute payments also get £9m a season for the naming rights to their stadium and their shirts could we not do the same for lets say a company run and owned by member of DC family. who could legitimately put in anything up to £5m a season without the EFL being overly bothered.

 

I am all for charity but lets have that sponsorship when we are getting £100m a season for taking part in the premier league. 

 

How do you know that Chansiri is not putting a fair whack into the sponsorship in terms of having his brands on the shirt and in the stadium?

 

As badly as he has managed to balance the books, our income has increased by over £10M annually compared to what we were bringing in prior to his turnover.  

If another company was to offer more for the sponsorship than he is injecting I am sure he would consider it.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, BARMYARMY2010 said:

Room,you've been banging that "mythical, multi million" sponsorship drum for ages. 

Other than Stoke's pre-existing deal with their owners, who else in the Championship has a multimillion shirt/ground sponsorship deal.? 

 

Nobody but he always quotes Premier League sponsorship deals (which Stoke’s was) to “prove” his point.

 

Full ofshite particularly on this subject.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sonofbert2 said:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with having Chansiri or any other of his companies on our shirts as long as he only pays the going rate, around 400k tops I believe and it obviously helps re. FFP.

 

The EFL found nothing wrong with any of that stuff plus the stadium sale itself and we were only found guilty of spending too much.

 

The last time we gave the sponsorship away to SCH when we really did need the fuckingmoney it was spoiled by the chairman who gave it away leaking to the Yorkshire Post that we hadn’t paid SCH up yet.

 

MM gave away sponsorship for a full season in anticipation of a deal that never came through so therefore we were never paid.

 

I’ve said it before but our more recent shirt sponsors tell the story of our club.

 

By all means sell it to someone willing to pay for the privelege but don’t assume that having any Chansiri group company on there is some sort of freebie.

 

The End.

Fair enough but it just looks crap havin the chairmans name on tje shirt

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Therealrealist said:

Fair enough but it just looks crap havin the chairmans name on tje shirt

 

Can't say it is any worse than having a betting company emblazoned across the front, which is what the majority of teams at this level had last season.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...