Jump to content

Garry Monk and Adam Reach both agree he's a striker now


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

Not at all


All I'm saying is that Adam Reach's only effective position is on the left wing putting killer crosses in


Anywhere else and he's a total waste of a shirt, offers nothing, and the team plays like they do if they'd had a man sent off


That's no criticism of Adam Reach by the way - as a left winger he's great


But if we can't play him there he needs to go, not shoehorned  into  the side

You’ve missed the point of my post. You are giving your opinion which many agree with (including me).  What I am saying is that we don’t know what Monk is really saying here other than he wants Reach to play more centrally - but how more centrally? There is more than one way to play in a central position. 
 

 

Edited by shandypants
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shandypants said:

You’ve missed the point of my post. You are giving your opinion which many agree with (including me).  What I am saying is the we don’t know what Monk is really saying here other than he wants Reach to play more centrally - but how more centrally? There is more than one way to play in a central position. 

 

 

Anywhere other than left wing is a no go for me


I don't care how centrally it is


He's been tried many many times in other positions and been completely missing during games to the point you might as well just name a ten man starting lineup
 

  • Like 1

 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, @owlstalk said:

 

 

Anywhere other than left wing is a no go for me


I don't care how centrally it is


He's been tried many many times in other positions and been completely missing during games to the point you might as well just name a ten man starting lineup
 

I agree but what is Monk really saying other than Reach is earmarked to play centrally. How centrally? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Holmowl said:

Rhodes is a far better striker than Reach.

 

Reach is a better LWB than Harris.

 

Harris is a better RWB than Odubajo.

 

I suspect Monk uses a hammer and scissors to do a jigsaw.

Rhodes is a far better striker than Reach. - debatable, both shocking

 

Reach is a better LWB than Harris. - yes

 

Harris is a better RWB than Odubajo. - unsure

 

I suspect Monk uses a hammer and scissors to do a jigsaw. - possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...