OxonOwl Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 What is the message behind giving van Aken no.4 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRMIFF Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 minute ago, malek said: Fully expected us not to give number 1 shirt to either Wildsmith or Dawson. Guess it is Monk's way of sending message how he expect them to fight hard with each other for that starting spot. I agree with this 100% it’s more a reflection on how close they are and still not sure 100% who’s is his number 1 then saying he not happy with them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch McLovin Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 hours ago, KivoOwl said: Christ almighty that's depressing reading. Paying Premier League prices for a squad like that. Couldnt agree more. Would love this to be put to DC at the earliest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch McLovin Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 hour ago, TrickyTrev said: A) Would you prefer the prices at Sheffield Wednesday across the board, for example Season Tickets, matchday tickets, official merchandise, corporate hospitality, were reduced to previous eras? The consequence of this would be the sale of key senior players, regular promotion to the first team of academy youngsters and a reduced level of investment. Answer: Yes 29.94% No 70.06% B) Alternatively, would you prefer the club to build on the current level of investment, maintain the pricing structure, and extend our ongoing strategy geared towards promotion to the Premier League. Answer: Yes: 70.14% No: 29.86% Chansiri: Thankyou for taking part in the survey, however I have decided to maintain the prices at the levels in Question 2 and Promote a reduced level of investment as detailed in Question 1. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leaping Lannys Perm Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 I'm not a complete traditionalist, I don't care if numbers 1-11 are out best players. But what is the point in leaving so many of the numbers 1-11 vacant and then going so far into the numbers. I cant see it being awaiting new signings given the high numbers some of our most recent signings have. And I know some players have preferred numbers but I can't see the entire squad being like that. Is it just a ploy to sell more double digit printing in the club shop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 hour ago, room0035 said: Its not exactly a pat on the back for Rhodes those is it, you are my main striker who I want to score the goals to get us out of this mess we are in. Oh by the way I am giving you the number 20 shirt, so I can give No9 to the player we bring in on loan when you are not delivering the goods. or Alternatively Monk: Rhodes What number do you want ? Rhodes: Im not bothered gaffer chuck us the number 20 Monk: Are you sure, because there might be a few fans who take it as a negative slant towards you Rhodes: Im fine with it Ever thought that the majority of modern day footballers don't think like the old footballers and really don't give a monkeys about it, the majority have known nothing else but squad numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Henderson Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Think squads are to be limited to 25 players so that paves the way for a 20 goal a season number 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watto Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 41 minutes ago, OxonOwl said: What is the message behind giving van Aken no.4 ? A foo.kin ridiculous one 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MallorcaOwl Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 46 minutes ago, TrickyTrev said: No but the question was what is your preference. I was just giving my preference. I really don't have a preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watto Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 23 minutes ago, Leaping Lannys Perm said: I'm not a complete traditionalist, I don't care if numbers 1-11 are out best players. But what is the point in leaving so many of the numbers 1-11 vacant and then going so far into the numbers. I cant see it being awaiting new signings given the high numbers some of our most recent signings have. And I know some players have preferred numbers but I can't see the entire squad being like that. Is it just a ploy to sell more double digit printing in the club shop? Why do players get a preference to what number they'd like ? Should be allocated to them 1-11 and the rest 12-25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Just now, The_Limit_Owl said: You're not though are you? Can this ridiculous myth about our prices being higher than anybody else's be nipped in the bud please. Who else is higher then? Genuine question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 5 minutes ago, The_Limit_Owl said: You're not though are you? Can this ridiculous myth about our prices being higher than anybody else's be nipped in the bud please. Every thread ends up either slagging Chansiri, slagging Monk or just generally slagging the club and its usually done by the same select few posters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catdog1121 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 50 minutes ago, MRMIFF said: I agree with this 100% it’s more a reflection on how close they are and still not sure 100% who’s is his number 1 then saying he not happy with them Its so Westwood can come in with the No1 shirt when Monk gets the sack... He tried damn hard to get booted at the end of last season which has ended up with us starting this season with -12 points, now he is ignoring our best keeper and going to start the season with one useless striker, he must be thinking surely he can get his pay off soon... Is Monk a United fan by any chance? When we see Dawson as the lone striker we really know he is trying to get the sack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Just now, PARKOWL said: Every thread ends up either slagging Chansiri, slagging Monk or just generally slagging the club and its usually done by the same select few posters And defended by a select few posters. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 4 minutes ago, The_Limit_Owl said: All the top 6 last season. Then Brentford, Forest, Derby, QPR, Stoke even Millwall off the top, were the same as us, then we were on a par with a raft of clubs, the only ones with lower pricing were Luton, the dingle gimps and a couple of others. I'm talking home fans there, couldn't give a squeaky sheite what we charge away fans. Absolute BS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Just now, The_Limit_Owl said: Go on then, prove me wrong! You prove me wrong, you came up with the names who you reckon are dearer. With the exception of maybe Leeds, I would be surprised if there were many dearer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 6 minutes ago, PARKOWL said: Every thread ends up either slagging Chansiri, slagging Monk or just generally slagging the club and its usually done by the same select few posters 6 minutes ago, catdog1121 said: Its so Westwood can come in with the No1 shirt when Monk gets the sack... He tried damn hard to get booted at the end of last season which has ended up with us starting this season with -12 points, now he is ignoring our best keeper and going to start the season with one useless striker, he must be thinking surely he can get his pay off soon... Is Monk a United fan by any chance? When we see Dawson as the lone striker we really know he is trying to get the sack. Point proven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 minute ago, The_Limit_Owl said: Seen their prices in programmes and online etc. Look em up, you'd be surprised, then it's another myth busted. That's your proof? Brilliant - myth busted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etchesketch Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 hours ago, HirstWhoScoredIt said: Amazed Grant not given squad number. Doesn't mean anything. They can be given a number as and when needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catdog1121 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, PARKOWL said: Point proven Well its valid when the squad numbers are released yet out best keeper is kept off the sheet... And we have basically no strikers... The Monk lovers im sure will say its DC's fault or some other reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now