Squad Numbers

[wednesdaywizard]

1 minute ago, Vaughan said:

What the relevnce of 45 ?

 

All these spare numbers and Kachunga gets Forestieri's old shirt

 

 

 

 

I always thought it was a false 9 thing.  4+5.  Sure a player even had the plus on his shirt years ago.

[farlego]

I know it’s for charity but I find it really hard to distinguish some of the numbers very easily with this new font 

[Bluesteel]

1,3,5,6,9

 

I guess we may be reluctant to use no1 given that we don’t state a keeper preference. But it probably shows we want another wing back two midfielders and a cf.

[modboy]

1 minute ago, farlego said:

I know it’s for charity but I find it really hard to distinguish some of the numbers very easily with this new font 

 

Looked dreadful Vs Leicester

[Bluesteel]

9 minutes ago, Vaughan said:

What the relevnce of 45 ?

 

All these spare numbers and Kachunga gets Forestieri's old shirt

 

 

Anyone associated with Huddersfield have been obsessed with FF for a number of years so wouldn’t surprised me!

 

No Connor grant either. Nothing stopping him and hidalgo getting a shirt at some point though 

[beswetherick]

I know squad numbers don’t matter... but Pelupessy wearing 8 is sacrilege

[Craig enock]

15 minutes ago, Lombado said:

For those of us squinting at the previous post....

Its only when you see that group of players you realise what a job monk has on his hands to keep us in the league ,truly depressing 

[OxonOwl]

I think it a little odd that only just over half of 1-11 are used, and a couple of surprising names amongst those that are.

[HirstWhoScoredIt]

Amazed Grant not given squad number.

[Guest]

17 minutes ago, farlego said:

I know it’s for charity but I find it really hard to distinguish some of the numbers very easily with this new font 

 

The red shirt is number 20 and the blue shirt is number 21. 

[mattitheowl]

29 minutes ago, Vaughan said:

What the relevnce of 45 ?

 

All these spare numbers and Kachunga gets Forestieri's old shirt

 

 

 

4+5=9.  Some players do it with 18 (Joao).

 

Could we be the first team ever to field a team with no 1-11?  Ours will be a starting line up from 20 north!

[Inspector Lestrade]

[malek]

No squad number for Grant?! Did great against Leicester and is probably our most talented youngsters. 

 

So depressing to see Joey wearing number 8 shirt. 

 

Looking at that number it is almost like a NBA team roster. 

Edited September 4, 2020 by malek

[helmut_rooster]

33 minutes ago, nevthelodgemoorowl said:

Why not have on the back of the shirts each players DNA profile on the shirts ?

 

Or a QR code

[Django]

53 minutes ago, KivoOwl said:

Christ almighty that's depressing reading.

 

Paying Premier League prices for a squad like that.

Nobody has to pay anything at the minute 

[sage owl]

3 minutes ago, Django said:

Nobody has to pay anything at the minute 

Tell that to Chansiri. 

[Django]

1 minute ago, sage owl said:

Tell that to Chansiri. 

Exactly

 

I’ve been critical like many others, but let’s not forget he’s pretty much 99.9% propping the club up right now

[doubleo]

1 hour ago, room0035 said:

SO Westwood does not even get a squad number and he is the one with the problem and Joost van Aken a bit player at best gets No4. 

 

Why don't they just scrap the squad numbers what is the point anymore.

 

No 1, 3, ,5 6, 9

Could be a signal to Westwood - No 1 - yours if you want it ?

[mattitheowl]

6 minutes ago, doubleo said:

Could be a signal to Westwood - No 1 - yours if you want it ?

 

I'd say it's more a message to him to say "f*ck off, you're not wanted".

[Guest]

1 hour ago, S36 OWL said:

 

Agreed. 1 to 11. That's how it should always be. 

 

I think these squad numbers are a fair reflection.

 

Most of us can't agree on what our best 11 is and the club can't decide on this either. Many of us us feel there are significant gaps in the team in terms of the goalkeeping, defensive and attacking positions and that is reflected in these numbers.