Jump to content

Derby’s case dismissed!


Recommended Posts

 

6 minutes ago, Marc_Degryse said:

Jesus Christ! As I've said elsewhere the trick for dealing with these FFP rules is not really toeing the line, it's more how creatively or audaciously you can circumvent them. Our only real failing then is that we've gone about this in a completely idiotic way. And who will suffer most from this? The fans.

 

If we don't win this appeal, Chansiri should resign as chairman on the spot and look for a new owner asap. In any other walk of life or business heads would roll for a ******** up of this magnitude!

 

🙈

 

Chansiri has already got his next job lined up, that of a landlord.  £3m a year is not bad going really. 

 

Whoever signed up to that agreement at Wednesday!  what were they thinking?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Manwë said:

 

 

Chansiri has already got his next job lined up, that of a landlord.  £3m a year is not bad going really. 

 

Whoever signed up to that agreement at Wednesday!  what were they thinking?

 

The agreement was signed between DC and DC :Chansiri:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheEnchanter said:

Didn't back date stadium sale or try to cover it. We did. Thats the difference. 

Not surprised they haven't been charged with anything. 

 

 

Exactly this. Chansiri tried claiming he sold the stadium to a company which did not exist until 12 months AFTER he said it was sold to try and swerve FFP. That's why we got nailed to the floor. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Plonk said:

Very interesting. The big question has to be why and what impact it has on our appeal?

 

Why: read the post immediately above yours.

 

What impact: very little I imagine, 2 completely separate cases.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theowlsman said:

The EFL’s bias against us will be their undoing.

 

Inconsistency is not a great trait when it comes to disciplinary matters.

 

They chose Wednesday as a scapegoat to put others off selling their grounds in a similar way.

 

They selected the wrong scapegoat. Thought we were a soft touch. 

 

Yeah, minus 12 points.

 

We really showed em!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Willow Owl
1 hour ago, sonofbert2 said:

It sets a good precedent in terms of our ground sale and reinforces the panel’s previous decision that we did nothing wrong in terms of that transaction in itself which means we can bung in the money into more recent accounts.

 

Our appeal will be based on the technicalities of the punishment and when it was imposed based on breaching FFP.

Was going to ask that, thanks for explaining 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Willow Owl
35 minutes ago, Marc_Degryse said:

Jesus Christ! As I've said elsewhere the trick for dealing with these FFP rules is not really toeing the line, it's more how creatively or audaciously you can circumvent them. Our only real failing then is that we've gone about this in a completely idiotic way. And who will suffer most from this? The fans.

 

If we don't win this appeal, Chansiri should resign as chairman on the spot and look for a new owner asap. In any other walk of life or business heads would roll for a ******** up of this magnitude!

 

🙈

So you want the chairman to break the rules and if caught resign.

I think Chansiri would lose more than the fans. £150 million plus already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has nothing to do with our punishment. If we had sold the ground when the league told us to we wouldn't have breached ffp and we wouldn't have a points deduction. 

 

Until DC gets in people who can run a club properly, and listens to them more importantly, we are gonna flop from one disaster to another. He may have money but he's got no clue when it comes to running a championship football club it seems. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beauchief Owl said:

Just highlights the fact that it was the way DC did the sale rather than the sale itself that was the problem.

Very, very infuriating!

 

The independent panels written reasons actually highlight the fact that it was nothing to do with the sale.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...