Jump to content
TheCityIsOurs

Would You Take Josh Windass Back?

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Bit like a poor man’s Forestieri - can’t pin down his best role.

 

Doesnt look a striker. We don’t play a SS.

 

Has played AM a lot and I can see why. Maybe sat in front of Bannan and Luongo that would work, and provide 4 or 5 much-needed goals.

 

Wasnt much impressed by him, but he can play a number of roles which in our new world does make him an asset.

 

Yes, if cheap. 

Edited by Holmowl
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

100%, solid mid table player which is what the club need at the moment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, he'd be one less player to worry about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Football manager (know it's not accurate) have him as on £11k.a week.

 

Much more appropriate for a FL player than previous season squad members 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Holmowl said:

Bit like a poor man’s Forestieri - can’t pin down his best role.

 

Doesnt look a striker. We don’t play a SS.

 

Has played AM a lot and I can see why. Maybe sat in front of Bannan and Luongo that would work, and provide 4 or 5 much-needed goals.

 

Wasnt much impressed by him, but he can play a number of roles which in our new world does make him an asset.

 

Yes, if cheap. 

That's pretty much what young Windass is....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As good as were going to get under the circumstances and I think he does have something to offer to a mid league (hopefully) championship team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, davetherivelinowl said:

I'm dying to play for Wednesday too... sign me up. 

 

I'm surprised so many on here are so keen to keep him. Is it because he's available for free and we can't resist a bargain? My mum had a saying for that: buy cheap, buy twice.

 

I just don't think he's good enough. On the other hand we have only one striker on the books with only 5 weeks to go. Maybe we have to get some bodies in, regardless. He'd be better than any of our academy and better than no-one at all. But that's no way to piece together a meaningful squad.

I suppose it then comes down to price. If there is no transfer fee and he or his agent are not demanding silly wages then in my mind he would be a good addition. Once we start paying fees I would question how much has he proven his worth at this level? League one and Scottish football are a different kettle of fish to the week in week out grind of the championship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there were encouraging signs to give him an opportunity should it be available. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will Paul Cook accept him back?

And is it Paul Cook who's making our signings or has Monk not been told he's history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing special, that Wigan loaned him to us says a lot. Maybe as a cheap squad filler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lincowl said:

Nothing special, that Wigan loaned him to us says a lot. Maybe as a cheap squad filler.

I’m in no hurry to sign 26 year old squad fillers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, definitely, and try and get Wickham back too. I think they make a very good pairing at this level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, TheCityIsOurs said:

A6BA5FE4-696D-4EAC-BE29-CE982836F144.png

For free yes. Otherwise no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, S36 OWL said:

 

350k 

 

Not a penny more 


350k!

 

For this gourd?!

 


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, RUMBELOWS91 said:

Yes, definitely, and try and get Wickham back too. I think they make a very good pairing at this level.


For all their talent, Hooper, Fletcher and Forestieri would not be signed right now because we know they regularly miss swathes of the season.

 

Wickham is far far less reliable.

 

If we sign him we have taken leave of our senses. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Windass back in our squad 100%. He was a rare bright spot in a dismal end of season run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...