Jump to content

Chansiri meets with the SWFC Supporters Trust


Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, DSandersonOWL said:

Properly speaking of course you can in the case of my <proper> !

In fact the '<' and the '>' are not parentheses but quote marks which should correctly be written <<......>> but I just use one as it looks better! 

Please note that the proper plural of <parenthesis> is <parentheses>  !

 

Wow, I nether new that, my English will be lot better know.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DSandersonOWL said:

Properly described they are not <long pointed arrows> and they are not replacing <parentheses> but are a form of quotation marks that has existed since early 16th century printing. May be called <guillemets>. No longer in common use in England but I am very old-fashioned.

 

In proper English the plural of <parenthesis> is <parentheses> as you will find in the authoritative Oxford Dictionary!!

 

This is all very <Owlstalkish> going off in random directions. 

The original question was <Is Monk a proper manager?>

And what does<proper manager> mean? 

There is hope yet that he is, after yesterday, but after Wednesday on Tuesday who knows? 

 

 

That's a long winded apology.. but I accept..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Socialist_Owl said:

The club crest, for one.  

 

Bring back the classic

 

I prefer to call it 'iconic', because of how recognisable and brandable it is. From a marketing perspective it should've been embraced

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bobness said:

 

I prefer to call it 'iconic', because of how recognisable and brandable it is. From a marketing perspective it should've been embraced

It's so identifiable and absolutely in line with all modern branding tenets.  Simple, reproducible.

 

Moving away from that kind of built-up identity is just stupid from a marketing perspective, tbh.

Edited by Socialist_Owl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/07/2020 at 19:19, Ellis Rimmer said:

I genuinely think Chansiri is sound, he's made a right pig's ear out of FFP but I think he will learn from his mistakes and get us where we want to be.

 

I don't think he will be chuffed himself to have wasted a fortune on the likes of Rhodes, Van Aken and Abdi. 

 

At the end of the day he will feel it more than anyone cos most of the mistakes are his, he isn't trying to antagonise Wednesday fans, he's not an Oyston or even an Allen, we've got a good guy we need to keep faith

i'd forgotten abdi, FFS why mention him again?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Socialist_Owl said:

I'd still like full transparency of how that all went down and who ultimately benefitted.   We'll never get it, though.

i'll never forget us having to give qpr their transfer money back for vic mobley, yet we got eff all in the abdi deal, apart from shafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...