Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wonder how much the running costs of hillsborough are. This is something that won’t be the responsibility of the club anymore and fall to DC/his wife/whichever company owns the ground

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Essix Blue said:

I’m guessing for the current charge we are defending, if we are found guilty and receive a deduction PLUS a suspended deduction, the suspended part would come into play if we broke PnS rules again?

 

So in theory, if we are found guilty and let’s say get a -9 deduction (whether this season or next), then find we’ve broken PnS AGAIN when the 2018/19 accounts are published (which is imminent), we could have a further deduction. That’d be either -9 now (and relegation) and a further deduction in L1 - OR -9 next season in Championship then a further deduction next season also, which would mean we’d be favourites to go down. 
 

Yeh I know I’m being pessimistic but hey, I’ve supported this lot for over 40 years 

 

If we have broken the rules in the current case then it will be because the stadium sale will have been disallowed from the 2017-18 accounts, in which case it will surely be allowed into the 2018-19 accounts due to be released by the end of the week.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, hirstyboywonder said:

 

If we have broken the rules in the current case then it will be because the stadium sale will have been disallowed from the 2017-18 accounts, in which case it will surely be allowed into the 2018-19 accounts due to be released by the end of the week.

That still doesn’t necessarily mean we’d be clear. Also, I believe, the panel could decide we overvalued the ground. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jamese said:

I wonder how much the running costs of hillsborough are. This is something that won’t be the responsibility of the club anymore and fall to DC/his wife/whichever company owns the ground

I guess it depends on the terms of the lease. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Essix Blue said:

I guess it depends on the terms of the lease. 

Which you’d hope would have been ‘negotiated’ in favourable terms to the club....

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jamese said:

Which you’d hope would have been ‘negotiated’ in favourable terms to the club....


You would hope so wouldn’t you seeing as it’s Chansiri that funds it regardless ! 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, theowlsman said:

I came here to argue nonsense with somebody else who knows nowt.

 

Who wants to start?

Nowt wrong with nowt, much better than nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, theowlsman said:

I came here to argue nonsense with somebody else who knows nowt.

 

Who wants to start?

Is UK election process fair?

Should animals be used in experiments/testing?

Is the death penalty effective?

Do religious movements cause war?

Are season tickets priced too high? 

Is the independent tribunal taking too long? 

Should Sophie Ridge be allowed on TV more than once a week? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, owls-swfc said:

Is UK election process fair?

Should animals be used in experiments/testing?

Is the death penalty effective?

Do religious movements cause war?

Are season tickets priced too high? 

Is the independent tribunal taking too long? 

Should Sophie Ridge be allowed on TV more than once a week? 

 

 

Yes you’re right, I apologise lol

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A very long time ago, when I was at school.  We were taught, if we were not 100% sure of the facts, it's better not to offer an opinion.  

A few contributing to this thread could have done with similar advice. 

Edited by Sham67
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Essix Blue said:

That still doesn’t necessarily mean we’d be clear. Also, I believe, the panel could decide we overvalued the ground. 

 

I agree, we could still more than likely be over in the 3-year period regardless of which period they put the sale into. If they do disallow from 2017-18 though, we would then show a £20M or loss for 2016-17, around £25-£30M for 2017-18 and potentially a small profit for the forthcoming accounts with the stadium sale, given that the wage bill should also have reduced compared to the previous year.

Yes we would possibly still be over, but when clubs are so far over in previous years they do take signs of doing something about the losses into account and we would have gone from a £25-£30M loss to a profit in one season! 

:Chansiri:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sham67 said:

A very long time ago, when I was at school.  We were taught, if we were not 100% sure of the facts, it's better not to offer an opinion.  

A few contributing to this thread could have done with similar advice. 

 

The forum, never mind this thread, would be dead if everyone followed that advice!

 

:bullen:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, owls-swfc said:

Is UK election process fair?

Should animals be used in experiments/testing?

Is the death penalty effective?

Do religious movements cause war?

Are season tickets priced too high? 

Is the independent tribunal taking too long? 

Should Sophie Ridge be allowed on TV more than once a week? 

 

The death penalty is only effective if nobody survives...but yes to the rest because I have to go to the pub...

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sham67 said:

A very long time ago, when I was at school.  We were taught, if we were not 100% sure of the facts, it's better not to offer an opinion.  

A few contributing to this thread could have done with similar advice. 

 

tumblr_m1x8oqJZkg1qbr9p2o2_500.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, hirstyboywonder said:

 

The forum, never mind this thread, would be dead if everyone followed that advice!

 

:bullen:

Spot on mate...Be the total ruination of the site..."Facts killed Owlstalk".........................like wot Neil did to fanzines

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, jamese said:

Which you’d hope would have been ‘negotiated’ in favourable terms to the club....

 Negotiated by DC with....... errrrr.........

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Sham67 said:

A very long time ago, when I was at school.  We were taught, if we were not 100% sure of the facts, it's better not to offer an opinion.  

A few contributing to this thread could have done with similar advice. 

 

You're not suggesting that people post opinions that are not factual :ghoulguy:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...