Jump to content

Euro 96' and England


Recommended Posts

Watching rewinds of the games it struck me,this was supposed to be the pinnacle of English football, but we only won 2 games in normal time, and one of those wins was against Scotland.

 

Suppose it was the cultural vibe at the time in England-New Labour, ,jobs, Oasis, rave parties, great music and everyones seemed to be happy.

 

And the weather was good.

 

In hindsight the England team was the first wave of celebrity footballers now look like a bunch of ponces plus Tony Adams/Stuart Pearce.  Adams was probably pissed.

 

The football also looks basic compared to todays game.  With a mix up of fast passing/kick and run/get it to Mcmanaman/Gazza and hope they do something.  Like watching a Championship game today.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HIGHERSTATE said:

Watching rewinds of the games it struck me,this was supposed to be the pinnacle of English football, but we only won 2 games in normal time, and one of those wins was against Scotland.

 

Suppose it was the cultural vibe at the time in England-New Labour, ,jobs, Oasis, rave parties, great music and everyones seemed to be happy.

 

And the weather was good.

 

In hindsight the England team was the first wave of celebrity footballers now look like a bunch of ponces plus Tony Adams/Stuart Pearce.  Adams was probably pissed.

 

The football also looks basic compared to todays game.  With a mix up of fast passing/kick and run/get it to Mcmanaman/Gazza and hope they do something.  Like watching a Championship game today.

 

are you suggesting that the game has moved on in the last 25 years..... cos..... it probably has... I'd still pick Shearer though! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Burnsie said:

are you suggesting that the game has moved on in the last 25 years..... cos..... it probably has... I'd still pick Shearer though! 

Yea thats what I was saying earlier...despite him coming across as a bit of a c@ck...he's a born winner, I'd hate to be around him after a defeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shearer was such a good striker. Always been my all time footballing hero. Watched the games back to see if my mind was playing tricks on me and remembering him as being better than he was but no, he was class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, markg said:

Shearer was such a good striker. Always been my all time footballing hero. Watched the games back to see if my mind was playing tricks on me and remembering him as being better than he was but no, he was class.

Although prior to Euro 96 he'd gone through a dry spell in front of goal, over a year I think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Burnsie said:

Although prior to Euro 96 he'd gone through a dry spell in front of goal, over a year I think 

 

After Euro 92 and the retirement of Lineker England increasingly relied on David Platt. He was the form player in the squad and often captained the side due to injuries and numerous changes during the Taylor era.

 

Gascoinges perennial injuries meant Platt was often the star playmaker and lead penalty taker. He dragged up the average England side of the early 90's often single-handedly and mixed with Shearers stuttering England career chipped in with crucial goals.

 

The 90's saw a glut of English talent up front that never translated to success. Fowler, Cole, LeTissier, Ferdinand, Wright...

 

Despite those, only Shearer was able to really stamp an international reputation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Arthur Bach said:

 

After Euro 92 and the retirement of Lineker England increasingly relied on David Platt. He was the form player in the squad and often captained the side due to injuries and numerous changes during the Taylor era.

 

Gascoinges perennial injuries meant Platt was often the star playmaker and lead penalty taker. He dragged up the average England side of the early 90's often single-handedly and mixed with Shearers stuttering England career chipped in with crucial goals.

 

The 90's saw a glut of English talent up front that never translated to success. Fowler, Cole, LeTissier, Ferdinand, Wright...

 

Despite those, only Shearer was able to really stamp an international reputation.

I was only going in 96, but seem to remember Platt was a bit part player, which I found odd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

watched a little of the scotland game. embarrassing how poor england looked. Sure when I watched it live we weren't that bad. I suppose you compare the style and quality against that time in football, just doesn't compare to football today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Burnsie said:

I was only going in 96, but seem to remember Platt was a bit part player, which I found odd

 

Mark Wright, John Barnes and Peter Beardsley all staked a claim to be included in the Euro 96 squad.

 

Wright was a certainty but injured himself in an Engalnd warm up, Barnes played his last game for his country earlier in the year and I think age finally caught up with Beardsley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to the Guardian football weekly podcast; they watched England V Netherlands again .

 

Thoughts were it wasn't the 'hammering '  that has become legend, more of a freak result.

 

Gascoigne,  bar that goal against Scotland,  was awful all tournament..overweight and unfit. 

 

Venables was building a team and a system for the 1998 world cup, but Hoddle came in after Venables quit and built his own team.

 

When you look at the 96 & 98 squads, it's amazing that there is only 2 years between them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Half of the players looked like veterans/casualties of the drinking culture that was carrying on from the 80s and was on it's way out.

 

Thank god for Wenger in that respect.

 

Gazza looked 3 stone too heavy and was struggling to keep up with the game.  That goal though, shows he could have been world class.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch the Spain game.  Just watch it. 
 

Spain score 2 onside goals that are ruled off. 
 

they also win 3 pens but none given. 
 

dominate the game start to finish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bez said:

Watch the Spain game.  Just watch it. 
 

Spain score 2 onside goals that are ruled off. 
 

they also win 3 pens but none given. 
 

dominate the game start to finish. 

Yea I saw a bit of it...and they should have had a goal just before half-time.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tournament football is never classic, liquid football - much like FA Cup finals.

 

Often, the very best tournament performances are of a psychological and siege like nature. Italia 90 isn't thought of as being a footballing tournament but was a watershed in English football beyond the physical games themselves.

 

Countries often came up against other nations who were almost alien to them in footballing terms, especially the Asian and African nations. Look at how the Cameroonians lit up the afore mentioned tournament and the South Koreans in 2002.

 

The modern, cosmopolitan game at club level has eroded the competitive and curious nature of international football as more and more foreign players joined the Premier League and eligibility standards for players became more and more relaxed.

 

Playing for England, pre-21st century, carried an immense pride yet simutaneous burden upon players shoulders. And for me it was infinitely more interesting than the Americanised and sterile bore-festbof today.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bannofan said:

Listening to the Guardian football weekly podcast; they watched England V Netherlands again .

 

Thoughts were it wasn't the 'hammering '  that has become legend, more of a freak result.

 

Gascoigne,  bar that goal against Scotland,  was awful all tournament..overweight and unfit. 

 

Venables was building a team and a system for the 1998 world cup, but Hoddle came in after Venables quit and built his own team.

 

When you look at the 96 & 98 squads, it's amazing that there is only 2 years between them. 

 

We weren't consistently great but at the of the day we lost on penalties to the winners and could have easily won that game. Spain were easily the better side against us and we got lucky but that was often the case for Spain in that era, good to watch but lacked killer instinct and rub of the green at times.

 

We have had better squads in more recent years that have achieved much less. Knocked out in the group stage in Euro 2000 because we couldn't defend, failed to qualify for Euro 2008 which is embarrassing given how qualifying for these tournaments is much easier than it was in the 80's and 90's. 

Failed miserably at World Cups in 2010 and 2014 and knocked out by the mighty Iceland in Euro 2016.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Arthur Bach said:

Tournament football is never classic, liquid football - much like FA Cup finals.

 

Often, the very best tournament performances are of a psychological and siege like nature. Italia 90 isn't thought of as being a footballing tournament but was a watershed in English football beyond the physical games themselves.

 

Countries often came up against other nations who were almost alien to them in footballing terms, especially the Asian and African nations. Look at how the Cameroonians lit up the afore mentioned tournament and the South Koreans in 2002.

 

The modern, cosmopolitan game at club level has eroded the competitive and curious nature of international football as more and more foreign players joined the Premier League and eligibility standards for players became more and more relaxed.

 

Playing for England, pre-21st century, carried an immense pride yet simutaneous burden upon players shoulders. And for me it was infinitely more interesting than the Americanised and sterile bore-festbof today.

 

This is true in many cases. France hardly looked like world champions in the group stages of the last world cup, Spain lost their opening game in 2010, Italy snaked past Australia in the last 16 in 2006, Greece were a defensive borefest in 2004........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...