jonnyowl Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 What if we get a 12 point deduction this season, still stay up and the dingles go down! They wont have a case! Plus Chansiri and the two executives have had all changes dropped against them personally! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Owl 2 Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 1 minute ago, TodwickOwl said: ‘kin hell thought I missed a bombshell for a minute! Sorry Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 Just now, jonnyowl said: What if we get a 12 point deduction this season, still stay up and the dingles go down! They wont have a case! Seriously if I were the EFL I'd do exactly that to avoid any/all legal challenges as a result of the decision Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 The EFL won't charge us with anything, Chansiri was at Pizza Express on the day of the alleged misdemeanour. 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casbahowl Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, Belfast Owl 2 said: Didnt want to be named cause he would be sued if he was named. Very cowardly Or it was just made up! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 Just now, casbahowl said: Or it was just made up! Casbahowl in 'NANCY FROSTICK AT THE ATHLETIC MAKES UP SCANDALOUS QUOTE ' statement Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grandad Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, casbahowl said: Or it was just made up! Yeah I can fully imagine Nancy Frostrick making up that statement for her article and not retaining any proof that a club owner had said it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scram Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, Belfast Owl 2 said: Didnt want to be named cause he would be sued if he was named. Very cowardly I don't think he'd raise his head above the parapet for something so trivial It's pretty much a compliment compared to a lot of what he is openly being accused of currently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, Belfast Owl 2 said: Didnt want to be named cause he would be sued if he was named. Very cowardly I don't think the quote implies he's a paedo so I don't think it's actionable - the Athletic could be sued for repeating it if it is. It's more a case of a private opinion on a bloke who the individual being quoted still has to work with to some extent on EFL issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 Just now, Grandad said: Yeah I can fully imagine Nancy Frostrick making up that statement for her article and not retaining any proof that a club owner had said it. A quote as hard, tough and serious as that one would no WAY be 'made up' by any journalist Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwood Owl1 Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 I've not missed getting annoyed by football/FFP the EFL and all the rest of it. What a mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbupperthongowl Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 12 minutes ago, jonnyowl said: What if we get a 12 point deduction this season, still stay up and the dingles go down! They wont have a case! Plus Chansiri and the two executives have had all changes dropped against them personally! The 'legal' action is only for lost income, so for Barnsley it's what £3m?....give us 9 points and fine us the amount of compensation paid to the team relegated....biased I know, but seems to tick all the boxes and resolves their complaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Owl 2 Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 8 minutes ago, rickygoo said: I don't think the quote implies he's a paedo so I don't think it's actionable - the Athletic could be sued for repeating it if it is. It's more a case of a private opinion on a bloke who the individual being quoted still has to work with to some extent on EFL issues. I suspect Chansiri won't find it amusing anyway Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 Just now, Belfast Owl 2 said: I suspect Chansiri won't find it amusing anyway Lol Not finding it amusing doesn't mean you can sue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 15 minutes ago, casbahowl said: Or it was just made up! Which is a much more libellous suggestion than the quote itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 The Arbitration decision part of this ‘charge’ seems to be missing in action still doesn’t it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roscoe P. Coltrane Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 40 minutes ago, the monk said: You got access to his bank account ? As Chansiri got access to his Dad's bank account? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 12 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: A quote as hard, tough and serious as that one would no WAY be 'made up' by any journalist 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, Royal_D said: The Arbitration decision part of this ‘charge’ seems to be missing in action still doesn’t it You mean this bit of the article? While Wednesday waits for the hearing, which The Athletic understands is imminent, they can take some confidence from a small victory in the arbitration stage of the proceedings that saw all the personal charges against Chansiri, former chief executive Katrien Meire and finance director John Redgate dropped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted May 20, 2020 Share Posted May 20, 2020 The anonymous source sounds very bitter. So, the bottom club want another club relegated, without proof of wrongdoing, considering the panel has not yet even considered the charge. I dont doubt DC can come across as entitled, but I've met him a couple of times and always seemed a genuine guy (well when speaking to me anyway) There is no evidence that DC doesnt have money, in fact the very opposite considering what hes spent. Who are we supposed to be in debt to? Most of our 'debt'would be to DC? Considering the charges against individuals have (rightly IMO) been dropped, why should we be automatically relegated and not Derby? Will they want Reading relegated automatically too once their FFP process begins? How about Birmingham, their points deduction was ok? Will Villa be automatically relegated twice if they come down from the EPL due to their stadium sale? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now