Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Screenshot 2020-05-14 at 12.28.06.jpg

 

What’s everyone’s memories of him? Wasted potential? Or just crap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not much happening today

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first ever game at Hillsborough was vs Spurs in 97/98. 1-0 up with little left to play he was clean through but somehow managed to shoot wide when it looked easier to score. That's my overriding memory of him. That and him being all arms and legs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he was ok - a sort of Carlton Palmer/Reach player who covered a lot of ground, but unlike Palmer didn't look dominant in midfield.

 

He chipped in with the odd goal, but didn't set the world alight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Legs like bambi.

 

Not a bad player though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not as bad as some people give him credit for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

52 international caps. A good player.

 

When looking back on past players I find people tend to say things like he was not that good, one of the worst players we had. Comparing him to Waddle and Sheridan and co. While all the while forgetting we have been out the top flight for 20 years.  

 

The reality is he was much better than any player we got in our team now is.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think he was decent. Wasn't helped by having a weird physique (same reason a lot of uninformed non-Wednesday fans slag off Palmer), chipped in with a few goals and assists and covered a lot of ground, even if he wasn't that fond of a crunching tackle. I think his performances were better than most the English 'spine' of that team that sent us down - Atherton, Newsome, Sonner, Booth, etc, (dare I add Pressman too?) who were genuinely Championship level players at that stage of their career, even if 3-5 years earlier they had been Premier League standard mostly (obviously not including Sonner in that second part).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Decent. Didn't look like a footballer but had ability.

 

Would be the best player in our squad now if he was 25. That's for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wore shirt number 25. Gangly. I liked him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked him, Reach reminds me of him. But, he was signed by Pleat when the time came to replace some ageing greats. Waddle's boots were big shoes to fill for Rudi or Blinker coming into the squad. Inevitable comparisons were made, and they weren't in the same class. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Animis said:

he was ok - a sort of Carlton Palmer/Reach player who covered a lot of ground, but unlike Palmer didn't look dominant in midfield.

 

He chipped in with the odd goal, but didn't set the world alight.

He wasn’t fit to lace CP’s boots I’m afraid bang average at best 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skilful but boy was his tackling frustrating

 

in a successful team you can sometimes accept one of these but when its all hands to the pump.... it shows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was mainly rubbish with rare flashes of potential. Was a poor version of Sibon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, siowls said:

He was mainly rubbish with rare flashes of potential. Was a poor version of Sibon.

No that was Giles De Bilde.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember him scoring a really well taken volley beating Charlton 3-0 in December ‘98. Could be equally tidy and wasteful with possession, Reach reminds me of him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the biggest problem for Rudi was that we'd been spoilt over the last few seasons and our expectation was still high from that previous era when we were obviously on the decline and we still hadn't accepted/realised it. He'd walk into the current team and realistically any from the past 20 years so he certainly wasn't that bad and he really wasn't anywhere near the worse player from that particular era either.

 

Fair bit of talent, good workrate, a little bit of a wet fart in the tackle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought he was a decent player and doesn’t deserve any stick. To think we had a poor player in Booth who the fans liked because he ‘tried’

Booth had a decent first season and that was it, he was terrible after that imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...