Jump to content

Could this affect the Championship too?


Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:



Utterly Utterly bizarre...

So totally outer space it beggars belief

 

 

 

I could understand quarters so there’s 3 breaks to use hand-gel on the field. 

 

Sets a great example for fans and especially kids too.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Safety, my hairy arse.

 

Current research is suggesting that even recovery from the virus can leave organs damaged for an indeterminate period and that these effects are exacerbated by strenuous exercise. So what's the football authorities response to this?

 

Quick, quick, get 'em back out there. There's about 762 million reasons why we're so anxious to improve the nation's morale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:


Hand gel?

They're sweating, spitting and climbing all over each other

 

lol

 

 

Id be amazed if regular washing or more likely gelling isn’t part of any game management. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If football resumes in June and of course that’s a big if, we would’ve had a 3 month break which is the equivalent of the close season.

 

If they persist with trying to complete this season then however this pans out, it effects next season. Whatever decision they make about this season has to take into account next season.

 

The subject of money keeps cropping up but it’s a perfectly valid one. Without income clubs particularly lower down the scale will struggle even more to make ends meet.

 

Can you imagine the EFL coping with a flux of team’s struggling financially to fulfil their commitments. FFS they made a right pigs ear of it when it came to handling the issues of just Bolton and Bury not to mention later on Macclesfield?

 

I fear this isn’t going to end well for anyone in the game and let’s be honest, if the desire is to keep everyone safe and protect lives, which it should be. While current guidelines remain in place, getting football back on shouldn’t be even being considered?

Edited by Great Big Galaa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didnt realise the extra 10 minuites could be the difference between catching coronavirus and not. Wow. What a stupid thing to say. 

Either play the full 45  as it's safe to do so or dont play at all. 

The love I had for this game is really coming to an end. It's all about money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

 

Precisely why putting players onto a football pitch sweating and slavering over each other could be tantamount to murder

Don’t see a problem to be fair, as long as they have their phones on them at all times with the virus app activated.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, farlego said:

Not sure what difference losing 5 or 10 minutes would make regarding the safety of the players tbh.

some ideas being discussed are quite frankly bizarre 

 

If losing ten minutes per half is safer because of less time to interact. 

Surely not playing at all is far more preferable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, @owlstalk said:



You could make that even safer by having teams not actually in the same ground

Just send a goalkeeper along to the opponents ground, and have different penalty takers come in each day to take theirs

 

What have you gone and done...........

 

:ghoulguy:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...