Jump to content

SHEFFIELD - City Centre Redevelopment Thread


Recommended Posts

Aye. I suppose.

Until they become to the next age what the 70s office blocks have become to this one.

 

The one good thing about these new buildings is that they give you a real appreciation of some of the older stuff that gets hidden  on their shadows. 

 

The Roebuck was just another boozer at one time werent it. But now it looks like a Jewell amongst the jungle of faceless new  builds with its quaint double chimneys and Georgian windows. 

 

Most people think it's actually named after the animal. But it's actually named after John Roebuck MP. Sheffield industrialist and inventor. He came up with the leaden condensing chambers for the manufacture of sulphuric acid

Glad it didnt get pulled down when they wanted to. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Love 2

Just a bloke. Being dragged along in a world that moves too quick for it's own good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Errol Flashman said:

Aye. I suppose.

Until they become to the next age what the 70s office blocks have become to this one.

 

The one good thing about these new buildings is that they give you a real appreciation of some of the older stuff that gets hidden  on their shadows. 

 

The Roebuck was just another boozer at one time werent it. But now it looks like a Jewell amongst the jungle of faceless new  builds with its quaint double chimneys and Georgian windows. 

 

Most people think it's actually named after the animal. But it's actually named after John Roebuck MP. Sheffield industrialist and inventor. He came up with the leaden condensing chambers for the manufacture of sulphuric acid

Glad it didnt get pulled down when they wanted to. 

 

Really interesting stuff - thanks for this mate.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/05/2021 at 12:51, Errol Flashman said:

Aye. I suppose.

Until they become to the next age what the 70s office blocks have become to this one.

 

The one good thing about these new buildings is that they give you a real appreciation of some of the older stuff that gets hidden  on their shadows. 

 

The Roebuck was just another boozer at one time werent it. But now it looks like a Jewell amongst the jungle of faceless new  builds with its quaint double chimneys and Georgian windows. 

 

Most people think it's actually named after the animal. But it's actually named after John Roebuck MP. Sheffield industrialist and inventor. He came up with the leaden condensing chambers for the manufacture of sulphuric acid

Glad it didnt get pulled down when they wanted to. 

 

Been going in there on and off for over 40 years and never knew that.   Cheers mate.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Open Letter by Barbara Masters, Sheffield Councillor-:

 

I can’t be the only one thoroughly irritated by the artists’ impressions accompanying so many of the development proposals in and around the city. The one for the scheme for the redevelopment of the Devonshire Green site once occupied by Rare and Racy is a case in point.

The artists’ impression shows a striking building with a wide walkway to one side.

 

image.png.55e7cc8a0de0ecda84f23fc4c9a2451c.png

 

 

Anyone familiar with the site would realise that the relationships between the building, its neighbours and the walkway are disproportionate making it less intrusive than how it would appear on the ground.

It also failed to show how it would dominate its residential neighbours, something I bought up at the planning board and echoed and expanded on by other members.

 

A site visit allowed us to set the plans in context of the site and the surroundings. We were tasked with deciding whether the submitted plans were appropriate. What we decided by a majority of six to three with two abstentions was that they were not. People just relying on the artists’ impression might think differently. We believe there are sound planning reasons to refuse the application. Otherwise we risk the developer lodging a successful appeal which is costly.

 

In answer to my question, the planning officer made clear that the existing buildings cannot be demolished until a plan for replacement has been approved.

This theoretically allows the developer to come up with a new plan that will preserve much of the existing site.

Whether that will happen remains to be seen.

Permission has already been granted for the demolition with replacement .

 

 

We’re in this position because in Sheffield much of our heritage is subject to the vagaries of the market place and the priorities of developers.

 

  • I believe it’s breathtakingly short sighted to allow this situation to continue.
  • Until that changes people will have to take on each challenge as it comes.
  • Our heritage is part of our story and deserves protection.
  • We should celebrate it as other cities which value their heritage have successfully done.

-------------------------

 

Well said Barb.

Folks get exited with pictures of 'new stuff.'

Too often we throw the baby away with the bathwater.

 

  • Like 3

Just a bloke. Being dragged along in a world that moves too quick for it's own good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CGI artists impressions are always amazing.

 

They have photoshopped people leaughing and pointing at stuff and people on skateboards.

 

They also have whimsical young women on bicycles with fruit in the basket.

 

This is not real life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...