Jump to content
@owlstalk

No analysis of SWFC accounts until at least the end of July..

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Can’t really blame them (as long as they are all above board when they are sent in)

Edited by WalthamOwl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

 

Maguire has an agenda against us I'm afraid always seems to be an agenda and I had more than a few 'discussions' with him when I was still on twitter

 

edited to add how can you hide behind rules?

Edited by soldierboyblue
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:


Oh god..

Here we go..

Attack the pundit time...

Just my personal experience of trying to have a chat with him Neil. When asked a number of questions on Twitter he can't back things up and just comes out with the same old tag line. 

 

I don't mind the club getting hammered when there is reason to but as I have always said back it up with facts. The 'Hiding behind rules' quote says all IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can take or leave what he says and how he interprets things, but when he put in print that SWFC had broken the law with regards to the filing of the last set of accounts, I tend not to put any weight behind anything he does say or write. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BARMYARMY2010 said:

Can take or leave what he says and how he interprets things, but when he put in print that SWFC had broken the law with regards to the filing of the last set of accounts, I tend not to put any weight behind anything he does say or write. 

That was one of the things I asked how have we broken the law and it was met with nothing but conjecture by him. We haven't broken the law as you know otherwise HMRC and the plod would be on us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s never been a qualified professional account has he? Or any experience of accounting ‘in the real world’. Don’t know why people hang off his every word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Says only 4 clubs in the top 2 divisions have extended their accounts. Newcastle, Crystal Palace, Derby and ourselves. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BARMYARMY2010 said:

Can take or leave what he says and how he interprets things, but when he put in print that SWFC had broken the law with regards to the filing of the last set of accounts, I tend not to put any weight behind anything he does say or write. 

Did he mean because we filed them late? That is an offence. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A late filing penalty is a civil penalty and not a criminal offense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've calculated our overspend to be 4284727413 billion dollars. We're hoping to loan Jordan Rhodes to help get around this, on top of lifetime season tickets for £179,000 each. Take advantage of that wonderful offer. Early bird deadline set at June 30. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, rickygoo said:

Did he mean because we filed them late? That is an offence. 

 We didn’t file them late. SWFC changed the filing date. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t know why he’s so puzzled. 
 

Well, it’s unlikely our turnover has increased much. It’s unlikely our outgoings have changed much. So all he’d have to do is look at our last set of accounts and deduct the stadium profit, voila 18/19 accounts. Probably a £35m loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, FroggattOwls said:

 We didn’t file them late. SWFC changed the filing date. 

We changed the date - and then submitted them late based on the new date.

 

According to:-https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/latest-owls-news/what-soft-transfer-embargo-and-what-does-it-mean-sheffield-wednesday-177757

 

Edited by rickygoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:


Oh god..

Here we go..

Attack the pundit time...

 

Why would he say 'hidden behind the rules'? The rules are in place for a reason - we are abiding the rules, just as many others will be - it is not hiding.

 

Maguire has previously made some less than veiled barbed comments against the club, including using some some of acrostic hidden message in one of his articles to make a childish comment against Chansiri. Some of his reporting may be accurate but sometimes the way he reports it shows he is sticking the knife in rather than providing critical analysis. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hirstyboywonder said:

Maguire has previously made some less than veiled barbed comments against the club, including using some some of acrostic hidden message in one of his articles to make a childish comment against Chansiri.

 

He does that all the time not just about Chansiri. He thinks it's clever when it's clearly anything but. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, rickygoo said:

 

The reality is we were a long way off any such sanctions of a criminal nature being taken on that basis and as usual Maguire was being sensationalist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...